Leading Civil Procedure Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

466 reported cases · January 2023 to June 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Civil Procedure?

Singapore courts issued 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (242), of the 127 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (39), the median monetary award recorded was $16,000. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 466 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (81) · 2025 (117) · 2024 (125) · 2023 (143)
By court SGHC (242) · SGHCR (76) · SGHC(I) (40) · SGHC(A) (39) · SGCA (32) · SGDC (15) · SGHCF (10) · SGCA(I) (6) · SGMC (4) · SGFC (1) · SGSCT (1)
Outcomes (127 parseable) Appeal dismissed (39) · Appeal allowed (37) · Application dismissed (32) · Application allowed (7) · Application granted (4) · Claim dismissed (4) · Claim allowed (2) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1) · Judgment for the respondent (1)
Median monetary award $16,000 (across 12 awards)
Most active counsel Charlene Wee Swee Ting (9) · Thio Shen Yi (9) · Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen (8) · Ong Boon Hwee William (8) · T Abirami (8)

Compiled from 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to June 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (61 cases), Thio Shen Yi is the most active lawyer (13 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Civil Procedure appears in 466 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Striking out (28), Costs (24) and Stay of proceedings (14). The most active judge by reported case count is Goh Yihan (45 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (61 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Civil Procedure with 61 cases between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by WongPartnership LLP (52 cases) and Drew & Napier LLC (44 cases). 293 firms appeared in Civil Procedure cases during this period.

Who are the leading Civil Procedure lawyers in Singapore?

Thio Shen Yi is the most active Civil Procedure lawyer in Singapore with 13 case appearances between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by Jaikanth Shankar (11) and Charlene Wee Swee Ting (10).

Which judges handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Goh Yihan has handled 45 Civil Procedure cases between January 2023 and June 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Choo Han Teck (41 cases) and Steven Chong (26 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Civil Procedure cases are reported in Singapore courts?

466 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Civil Procedure, most often decided by Goh Yihan.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Civil Procedure cases?

The main sub-topics are Striking out (28), Costs (24) and Stay of proceedings (14).

Case Volume by Year

143
23
125
24
117
25
81
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 106 cases
cited in 57 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 50 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 49 cases
cited in 48 cases
cited in 45 cases
cited in 41 cases
cited in 29 cases
cited in 23 cases
cited in 18 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 9 cases
cited in 8 cases
Trustees Act (Cap 337)
cited in 7 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 7 of 19
[2025] SGHC 126
Lee Say Yng v Lee Cheng Mui
2 July 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCR 19
Chern Chye Keow & Anor v Roger Peter Ponniah, Administrator of the Estate of John Danaraj Ponniah, deceased
1 July 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHCR 20
GOH HUI EN REBECCA v IG ASIA PTE. LTD.
1 July 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGCA 31
Zhu Su v THREE ARROWS CAPITAL LTD & 2 Ors
24 June 2025
SGCA
[2025] SGHC 113
TAN TSE HAW v PEH TIAN SWEE & Anor
24 June 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCR 18
ARMIRA CAPITAL LIMITED v JI ZENGHE & 2 Ors
20 June 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGCA 25
CLARENCE LUN YAODONG v DENTONS RODYK & DAVIDSON LLP
11 June 2025
SGCA
[2025] SGHC 109
KUVERA PROPERTIES PTE. LTD. v FAR EAST OPUS PTE. LTD.
10 June 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCR 16
THIRD EYE CAPITAL CORPORATION v PRETTY VIEW SHIPPING S.A. & 2 Ors
26 May 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGCA 24
Cao Pei v McCom Holding Limited
23 May 2025
SGCA
[2025] SGHCR 14
SPACKMAN ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LIMITED v WOO SANG CHEOL
23 May 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC 95
Xu Xiangrong & Anor v Fu Xianwei & 8 Ors
22 May 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 91
CHENG SHI YING CHERISSA v KHOO CHONG KIAT & Anor
20 May 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 92
THE RESOLUTION AND COLLECTION CORPORATION v TSUNEJI KAWABE & 6 Ors
16 May 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 87
COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co., Ltd. v PT OKI PULP & PAPER MILLS & 2 Ors
9 May 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 84
CANSTONE MANAGEMENT LTD v ALLESTARI DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. & 6 Ors
6 May 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGMC 24
VIVEK KAPOOR & Anor v ZHANG XIAOSHI
5 May 2025
SGMC
[2025] SGHCR 12
ANDREW VIGAR v XL INSURANCE COMPANY SE SINGAPORE BRANCH
2 May 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHCR 9
TAN TSE HAW v PEH TIAN SWEE & Anor
30 April 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC 74
KOH LIN YEE (XU RENYI) v OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED
30 April 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCR 8
TIO GEOK HONG BRYAN V KORBETT PTE LTD & ANOR
28 April 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC 80
RITA KISHINCHAND BHOJWANI v HVS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED & 2 Ors
28 April 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC(I) 13
Hii Yii Ann & Anor v Tiong Thai King & Anor
22 April 2025
SGHC(I)
[2025] SGHC 73
SHEE SEE KUEN & 13 Ors v SUGIONO WIYONO SUGIALAM & 6 Ors
22 April 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC(I) 12
DMF v DMG
17 April 2025
SGHC(I)

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.