Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte. Ltd. v P-H-O-E-N-I-X Petroleum Philippines, Inc. (a.k.a. Phoenix Petroleum Philippines, Inc.)

[2024] SGHC(I) 13 Singapore International Commercial Court 26 April 2024 SIC/OA 1/2024 ( SIC/SUM 8/2024,SIC/SUM 10/2024 ) 33 min read
12 cases cited (10 SG, 2 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court Singapore International Commercial Court
Decided
Judge Sir Henry Bernard Eder
Charges / claim Civil Procedure, Arbitration
Counsel Prolegis LLC, Rev Law LLC, Chan Kit Munn Claudia, Charlene Wee Swee Ting, Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen, Ker Yanguang (Ke Yanguang), Liew Yik Wee, Wong Wan Chee

Source: [2024] SGHC(I) 13, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (8)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd v P-H-O-E-N-I-X Petroleum Philippines, Inc (a.k.a. Phoenix Petroleum Philippines, Inc) [2024] SGHC(I) 13 was a Singapore International Commercial Court decision delivered on 26 April 2024 by Sir Henry Bernard Eder IJ, in Originating Application No 1 of 2024 (Summons Nos 8 and 10 of 2024), after a hearing on 19 April 2024. The proceedings concerned an arbitration brought under the auspices of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) in SIAC Case No ARB No 084 of 2022 (ARB 84) and a Final Award signed and dated 28 November 2023, which determined that the defendant, P-H-O-E-N-I-X Petroleum Philippines, Inc (Phoenix), and a third-party guarantor, Udenna Corporation (Udenna), were jointly and severally liable to the claimant, Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (PIMD), in aggregate amounts including US$142,932,694.04. The matter was framed under s 8 of the International Arbitration Act 1994 and Articles 6 and 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law, and Order 23 of the Singapore International Commercial Court Rules 2021. The catchwords record issues of breach of an arbitration agreement, an anti-suit injunction, and service of process. The claimant was represented by Prolegis LLC and the defendant by Rev Law LLC, with the judgment also referencing the Arbitration Act and the Supreme Court of Judicature Act.

[2024] SGHC(I) 13 explained

Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte. Ltd. v P-H-O-E-N-I-X Petroleum Philippines, Inc. (a.k.a. Phoenix Petroleum Philippines, Inc.) ([2024] SGHC(I) 13) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court on 26 April 2024. It is categorised under Civil Procedure and Arbitration. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGHC(I) 13 about?

Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte. Ltd. v P-H-O-E-N-I-X Petroleum Philippines, Inc. (a.k.a. Phoenix Petroleum Philippines, Inc.) ([2024] SGHC(I) 13) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Service”, “Arbitration — Agreement — Breach”, and “Arbitration — Anti-suit injunction”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2024] SGHC(I) 13 consider?

The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10), International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A), and Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

How influential is [2024] SGHC(I) 13?

Within this corpus, [2024] SGHC(I) 13 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

What was Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution v Phoenix Petroleum [2024] SGHC(I) 13 about?

It was a Singapore International Commercial Court decision of 26 April 2024 by Sir Henry Bernard Eder IJ concerning a SIAC arbitration (ARB 84) and a Final Award dated 28 November 2023, addressing breach of an arbitration agreement, an anti-suit injunction, and service of process.

What did the SIAC Final Award in the Pertamina v Phoenix dispute decide ([2024] SGHC(I) 13)?

The Final Award dated 28 November 2023 in SIAC Case No ARB 084 of 2022 determined that Phoenix Petroleum Philippines, Inc and third-party guarantor Udenna Corporation were jointly and severally liable to Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd in aggregate amounts including US$142,932,694.04.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (12)

SG (1)
[2018] SGHC 56
SLR (9)
[1997] 2 SLR(R) 862 [2002] 1 SLR(R) 1088 [2011] 4 SLR 739 [2013] 3 SLR 409 [2014] 3 SLR 166 [2018] 4 SLR 1420 [2019] 1 SLR 263 [2019] 1 SLR 732 [2021] 1 SLR 1045
UK (2)
[2002] 1 All ER 749 [2018] EWCA Civ 51

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC(I) 13)