COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co., Ltd. v PT OKI PULP & PAPER MILLS & 2 Ors
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | S Mohan |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Counsel | Clasis LLC, Providence Law Asia LLC, Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP, Abraham S Vergis, Axl Rizqy, Chan Wai Yi Kevin, Dawn Tan Si Jie, Dedi Affandi bin Ahmad, Hazel Cheah Kam Ying, Leong Lu Yuan, Ngo Wei Shing, Teo Wei Lin Elizabeth, Toh Kian Sing, Wu Muyu |
Source: [2024] SGHC 273, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (14)
Parties (4)
Case Significance
In COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co, Ltd v PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills and others [2024] SGHC 273, the General Division of the High Court ("General Division") considered whether it had jurisdiction to grant an interim stay of execution of an anti-suit injunction that had been granted by the Court of Appeal. S Mohan J granted the application by PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills ("OKI"), the first defendant, for an interim stay of execution of the Court of Appeal's anti-suit injunction pending the hearing and final determination of OKI's main application for a stay of execution. The proceedings arose in Admiralty in Personam No 50 of 2022 brought by COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co, Ltd, and concerned damage arising out of contact between the vessel "LE LI" (IMO No 9192674) and the jetty/structure at Tanjung Tapa Pier on or about 31 May 2022. Noting what he described as a dearth of authority on the point of principle, S Mohan J published these written grounds, dated 25 October 2024, focusing on the jurisdiction of the General Division to grant such interim relief.
[2024] SGHC 273 explained
COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co., Ltd. v PT OKI PULP & PAPER MILLS & 2 Ors ([2024] SGHC 273) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 25 October 2024. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2024] SGHC 273 about?
COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co., Ltd. v PT OKI PULP & PAPER MILLS & 2 Ors ([2024] SGHC 273) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Judgments and orders”, “Civil Procedure — Stay of proceedings — Stay of execution — Interim stay of execution”, and “Civil Procedure — Jurisdiction — Whether General Division of the High Court having jurisdiction to stay execution of order made by the Court of Appeal”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 273 consider?
The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68) and Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2024] SGHC 273 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHC 92. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2024] SGHC 273?
Within this corpus, [2024] SGHC 273 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills applied for an interim stay of execution of an anti-suit injunction granted by the Court of Appeal, pending the determination of its main stay application, in proceedings arising from a vessel owned by COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co, Ltd making contact with a jetty in Indonesia in May 2022; COSCO objected that the General Division of the High Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the application. The central issue was whether the General Division had jurisdiction to stay execution of an order made by the Court of Appeal. The court held that the General Division did possess such jurisdiction and granted the interim stay sought by OKI subject to conditions.
What jurisdictional question arose in COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers v PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills [2024] SGHC 273?
S Mohan J considered whether the General Division of the High Court had jurisdiction to grant an interim stay of execution of an anti-suit injunction that had been granted by the Court of Appeal, an issue on which he noted a dearth of authority.
What order did S Mohan J make in [2024] SGHC 273?
S Mohan J granted PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills' application for an interim stay of execution of the Court of Appeal's anti-suit injunction, pending the hearing and final determination of OKI's main application for a stay of execution.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (11)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 273)