ISU SPECIALTY CHEMICAL CO., LTD. v C&D (SINGAPORE) BUSINESS PTE. LTD.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Choo Han Teck |
| Charges / claim | Contract |
| Counsel | Clasis LLC, Selvam LLC, Chow Ee Ning, Joshua Ho Jun Yang, Leong Lu Yuan, Luis Inaki Duhart Gonzalez, Nicholas Lum Kin Leong, Sarbjit Singh Chopra |
Source: [2024] SGHC 285, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (8)
Case Significance
In ISU Specialty Chemical Co Ltd v C&D (Singapore) Business Pte Ltd [2024] SGHC 285, decided on 6 November 2024, the General Division of the High Court heard Originating Claim No 82 of 2022, with Choo Han Teck J delivering judgment after hearings on 6, 7, 16 and 20 August and 24 September 2024. The claimant and ISU Exachem Co Ltd were South Korean companies in the wholesale business of trading liquid fuel and related products; on 25 January 2024 ISU and the claimant entered a spin-off merger agreement, carried out on 2 April 2024, under which ISU's rights and obligations, including its entitlement to pursue the present claim, were transferred to and assumed by the claimant. The defendant, C&D (Singapore) Business Pte Ltd, was a Singaporean company in the wholesale trade of various goods. Between July 2020 and January 2021 the defendant had purchased Light Cycle Oil from ISU on six occasions, each a contract for 300,000 barrels negotiated between Oh Jung Hak (known as John Wu), an agent for ISU, and Ke Rulai (known as Jason Ke), the defendant's representative; the first five transactions were done by way of tender to Hyundai Oil Singapore Pte Ltd. The catchwords record the issue of contract formation and offer concerning the final transaction for barrels to be delivered in February 2021.
Summary
ISU Specialty Chemical Co Ltd, a South Korean liquid fuel trading company and successor to ISU Exachem Co Ltd, claimed against C&D (Singapore) Business Pte Ltd over the proposed sale of 300,000 barrels of Light Cycle Oil for March 2021 delivery, with the key dispute being whether negotiations between the parties' representatives had resulted in the formation of a binding oral contract of sale. The defendant also advanced a counterclaim concerning costs of an abortive arbitration. The General Division of the High Court, per Choo Han Teck J, dismissed the counterclaim on the basis that the defendant had not adduced evidence to support it.
What was ISU Specialty Chemical Co Ltd v C&D (Singapore) Business Pte Ltd [2024] SGHC 285 about?
The case concerned contract formation over Light Cycle Oil trades. The South Korean claimant, which had assumed ISU Exachem Co Ltd's rights through a spin-off merger, brought a claim against C&D (Singapore) Business Pte Ltd relating to dealings for barrels to be delivered in February 2021.
How were the earlier Light Cycle Oil transactions structured in [2024] SGHC 285?
Between July 2020 and January 2021, C&D (Singapore) Business Pte Ltd bought Light Cycle Oil from ISU on six occasions, each a contract for 300,000 barrels negotiated between agent Oh Jung Hak and Ke Rulai. The first five were done by tender to Hyundai Oil Singapore Pte Ltd.
Cases Cited (2)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 285)