THREE ARROWS CAPITAL LTD & 2 Ors v CHEONG JUN YOONG
Outcome
Application dismissedWe therefore dismiss the application.
Source: [2024] SGHC(A) 10, High Court (Appellate Division), decided 12 April 2024. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Appellate Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Debbie Ong, Valerie Thean |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Outcome | Application dismissed |
| Counsel | Drew & Napier LLC, WongPartnership LLP, Chin Tian Hui Joshua, Claire Neoh Kai Xin, Hing Shan Shan Blossom, Kwong Kai Sheng, Lionel Leo Zhen Wei, Liu Zhao Xiang, T Abirami |
Source: [2024] SGHC(A) 10, High Court (Appellate Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (2)
Counsel (9)
Case Significance
Three Arrows Capital Ltd and others v Cheong Jun Yoong [2024] SGHC(A) 10 was decided by the Appellate Division of the High Court (Originating Application No 42 of 2023), with Valerie Thean J delivering the judgment of the court (sitting with Debbie Ong JAD) on 12 April 2024 after a hearing on 28 February 2024. The applicants were Three Arrows Capital Ltd, an investment fund in the business of trading in cryptocurrency, together with its joint liquidators Christopher Farmer and Russell Crumpler. They sought permission to appeal against a decision of a Judge of the General Division of the High Court who had dismissed their applications to set aside an order granting the respondent, Cheong Jun Yoong, permission for service of an originating claim out of Singapore, and to set aside that service. The court dismissed the application for permission to appeal.
[2024] SGHC(A) 10 explained
THREE ARROWS CAPITAL LTD & 2 Ors v CHEONG JUN YOONG ([2024] SGHC(A) 10) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (Appellate Division) on 12 April 2024. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2024] SGHC(A) 10 about?
THREE ARROWS CAPITAL LTD & 2 Ors v CHEONG JUN YOONG ([2024] SGHC(A) 10) is a High Court (Appellate Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Appeals — Leave” and “Civil Procedure — Service — Leave for service out of jurisdiction”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2024] SGHC(A) 10 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHC(A) 7 and [2024] SGHC 21. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
What was decided in Three Arrows Capital Ltd v Cheong Jun Yoong [2024] SGHC(A) 10?
The Appellate Division of the High Court dismissed the application by Three Arrows Capital Ltd and its joint liquidators for permission to appeal. They had sought to challenge a decision refusing to set aside an order allowing Cheong Jun Yoong to serve an originating claim out of Singapore.
Who were the applicants in the Three Arrows Capital permission-to-appeal case [2024] SGHC(A) 10?
The applicants were Three Arrows Capital Ltd, an investment fund trading in cryptocurrency, together with its joint liquidators Christopher Farmer and Russell Crumpler. The respondent was Cheong Jun Yoong. The case concerned service of an originating claim out of jurisdiction.
Cases Cited (14)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC(A) 10)