T

Tan Kok Quan Partnership

38 reported cases 43 counsel named

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Tan Kok Quan Partnership. It is not a directory listing. Names, firm names and counsel appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current lawyers and contact details, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory or the firm's website.

Tan Kok Quan Partnership appears in 38 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the SGHC.

Reported cases
38
Courts
SGHC, SGCA, SGHC(A), SGHCR
Period
February 2023 to February 2026

Source: derived from 38 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Tan Kok Quan Partnership — Reported Cases & Litigation History

Tan Kok Quan Partnership's reported litigation history spans 38 Singapore court cases (2023–2026). The record below sets out who the firm has acted for and against, the courts, and what each court decided.

About Tan Kok Quan Partnership

Tan Kok Quan Partnership appears in 38 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). These were heard before SGHC (24), SGCA (7) and SGHC(A) (6).

What areas of law does Tan Kok Quan Partnership specialize in?

Tan Kok Quan Partnership appeared most frequently in Civil Procedure (20 cases), Companies (5 cases), and Damages (4 cases) between February 2023 and February 2026, across 38 total case appearances in Singapore courts.

Civil Procedure 20 cases

Tan Kok Quan Partnership appeared in 20 Civil Procedure cases between April 2023 and August 2025.

Companies 5 cases

Tan Kok Quan Partnership appeared in 5 Companies cases between February 2023 and January 2025.

Damages 4 cases

Tan Kok Quan Partnership appeared in 4 Damages cases between February 2023 and February 2026.

How many cases has Tan Kok Quan Partnership been involved in?

Tan Kok Quan Partnership appears in 38 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026).

Which courts does Tan Kok Quan Partnership appear in?

Tan Kok Quan Partnership appears before SGHC (24), SGCA (7) and SGHC(A) (6).

Counsel named in these judgments (43)

Lawyers recorded as counsel from Tan Kok Quan Partnership in at least one reported judgment, with the years they appear. Not a current staff list.

38
Cases
43
Counsel named
38
Appearances

All reported cases (38)

[2026] SGHC(A) 4 SGHC(A)
LOW WOON HONG v LIM CHUN YONG (LIN JUNXIONG)
3 February 2026
[2025] SGHCR 28 SGHCR
ORO NEGRO DRILLING PTE. LTD. & 5 Ors v INTEGRADORA DE SERVICIOS PETROLEROS ORO NEGRO, S.A.P.I. DE C.V. & 6 Ors
26 August 2025
[2025] SGHC(A) 10 SGHC(A)
Finaport Pte. Ltd. v Techteryx Ltd.
21 July 2025
[2025] SGHC 136 SGHC
The Law Society of Singapore v Yeo Poh Tiang (Yang Baozhen)
18 July 2025
[2025] SGHC 103 SGHC
DOM v DON
28 May 2025
[2025] SGHC(A) 6 SGHC(A)
CAMPBELL HOSPITALITY PTE LTD & 2 Ors v MARCHMONT PTE LTD
22 May 2025
[2025] SGCA 20 SGCA
KHOO PHAIK EAN PATRICIA & Anor v KHOO PHAIK ENG KATHERINE & 2 Ors
30 April 2025
[2025] SGHC 6 SGHC
DASIN RETAIL TRUST MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.
13 January 2025
[2024] SGHC 329 SGHC
Finaport Pte. Ltd. v Techteryx Ltd.
27 December 2024
[2024] SGHC 296 SGHC
TRUECOIN LLC v TECHTERYX, LTD
29 November 2024
[2024] SGHC 291 SGHC
Re: LOGISTICS CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD
13 November 2024
[2024] SGHC(A) 30 SGHC(A)
MARCHMONT PTE LTD v CAMPBELL HOSPITALITY PTE LTD & 2 Ors
26 September 2024
[2024] SGHC 176 SGHC
HYFLUX LTD (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION) & 35 Ors v KPMG LLP
10 July 2024
[2024] SGHC 150 SGHC
LIM CHUN YONG (LIN JUNXIONG) v JEFFREY YAP & 5 Ors
10 June 2024
[2024] SGHC 108 SGHC
MARCHMONT PTE LTD v CAMPBELL HOSPITALITY PTE LTD & 2 Ors
2 May 2024
[2024] SGHC 84 SGHC
HYFLUX LTD (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION) & 36 Ors v LUM OOI LIN
25 March 2024
[2024] SGCA 9 SGCA
GONZALO GIL WHITE v ORO NEGRO DRILLING PTE. LTD. & 5 Ors
22 March 2024
[2024] SGHC(A) 7 SGHC(A)
LUCKIN COFFEE INC v INTERACTIVE DIGITAL FINANCE LIMITED & 2 Ors
5 March 2024
[2024] SGCA 4 SGCA
ACF & Anor v AKI & 2 Ors
14 February 2024
[2024] SGHC 26 SGHC
Arbiters Inc Law Corporation v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph & Anor
31 January 2024
[2024] SGHC 1 SGHC
GOH TZE CHIEN v TAN TEOW CHEE & Anor
9 January 2024
[2023] SGHC 359 SGHC
LEONG QUEE CHING KAREN v LIM SOON HUAT & 5 Ors
29 December 2023
[2023] SGHC 356 SGHC
LIM SOON HUAT V LIM TEONG HUAT & 4 ORS
22 December 2023
[2023] SGCA 43 SGCA
LUM OOI LIN v HYFLUX LTD (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION) & 4 Ors
30 November 2023
[2023] SGCA 42 SGCA
HOW WENG FAN & 2 Ors v PASIR RIS-PUNGGOL TOWN COUNCIL
29 November 2023
[2023] SGHC 314 SGHC
KHOO PHAIK ENG KATHERINE & Anor v KHOO PHAIK EAN PATRICIA & Anor
31 October 2023
[2023] SGHC 297 SGHC
ORO NEGRO DRILLING PTE. LTD. & 5 Ors v INTEGRADORA DE SERVICIOS PETROLEROS ORO NEGRO, S.A.P.I. DE C.V. & 6 Ors
23 October 2023
[2023] SGHC 270 SGHC
HYFLUX LTD (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION) & 35 Ors v KPMG LLP
27 September 2023
[2023] SGHC 234 SGHC
LEONG QUEE CHING KAREN v LIM SOON HUAT & 5 Ors
23 August 2023
[2023] SGHC 209 SGHC
CRESCENDAS BIONICS PTE LTD v JURONG PRIMEWIDE PTE LTD
3 August 2023
[2023] SGHC 198 SGHC
INTERACTIVE DIGITAL FINANCE LIMITED & Anor v CREDIT SUISSE AG & Anor
24 July 2023
[2023] SGCA 22 SGCA
TANIA RAPPO v ACCENT DELIGHT INTERNATIONAL LTD & Anor
13 July 2023
[2023] SGHC 189 SGHC
FOO KOK BOON v NGOW KHEONG SHEN & 2 Ors
12 July 2023
[2023] SGCA 21 SGCA
HOW WENG FAN & 2 Ors v PASIR RIS-PUNGGOL TOWN COUNCIL
7 July 2023
[2023] SGHC 147 SGHC
Lang Ren Jee, Renata Mrs Tay Ren Jee, Renata v Toh Yih Wei
18 May 2023
[2023] SGHC 113 SGHC
HYFLUX LTD (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION) & 37 Ors v LUM OOI LIN
28 April 2023
[2023] SGHC 43 SGHC
Yap Sze Kam v Yang Kee Logistics Pte Ltd
24 February 2023
[2023] SGHC(A) 9 SGHC(A)
CRESCENDAS BIONICS PTE LTD v JURONG PRIMEWIDE PTE LTD
9 February 2023

In the court record

The reported judgments Tan Kok Quan Partnership appears in are aggregated on the practice-area court records below, each of which sets out the firms that appear most often in that area of the reported record.

These appearances also feed the Largest Law Firms in Singapore, Ranked by Reported Court Cases, the site-wide court-record ranking of Singapore firms by the number of reported judgments in which they appear.

Rankings

Most active law firms by reported court cases →