HYFLUX LTD (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION) & 36 Ors v LUM OOI LIN

[2024] SGHC 84 High Court (General Division) 25 March 2024 • HC/S 267/2022 ( HC/SUM 56/2024 ) |HC/S 268/2022 ( HC/SUM 144/2024 ) • 41 min read
8 cases cited (6 SG, 2 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court High Court (General Division)
Decided
Judge Goh Yihan
Charges / claim Civil Procedure
Counsel Davinder Singh Chambers LLC, Kenneth Tan Partnership, TSMP Law Corporation, Tan Kok Quan Partnership, Chin Yen Bing Arthur, Clarise Chew Shu-Min, Gitta Priska Adelya, Jaikanth Shankar, Joshua Phang Shih Ern, Juliana Lake, Kenneth Tan, Kevin Elbert, Leong Qianyu, Lu Yanrong Elycia, Ng Ka Luon Eddee, Ng Qiheng Glenn, Rajvinder Singh Chahal, Sheiffa Safi Shirbeeni, Shilpa Krishnan, Tan May Lian Felicia, Tay Zhuo Yan Isaac, Teo Jin Yun Germaine, Thio Shen Yi

Source: [2024] SGHC 84, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (23)

Parties (38)

Bendemeer Infrastructure Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) Plaintiff Eflux (Taizhou) Company Limited Plaintiff Eflux Singapore Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) Plaintiff H J Newspring Limited Plaintiff Hydrochem (S) Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) Plaintiff Hydrochem Membrane Products (Singapore) Pte Ltd Plaintiff Hyflux Asset Management Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) Plaintiff Hyflux Capital (Singapore) Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) Plaintiff Hyflux Consumer Products Pte Ltd Plaintiff Hyflux Energy Pte Ltd Plaintiff Hyflux Engineering (India) Private Limited Plaintiff Hyflux Engineering Pte Ltd Plaintiff Hyflux Filtech (Shanghai) Co, Ltd Plaintiff Hyflux Hi-Tech Product (Yangzhou) Co, Ltd Plaintiff Hyflux Innovation Centre Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) Plaintiff Hyflux International Engineering Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) Plaintiff Hyflux International Pte Ltd Plaintiff Hyflux Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) Plaintiff Hyflux Management and Consultancy Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) Plaintiff Hyflux Membrane Manufacturing (S) Pte Ltd Plaintiff Hyflux Sip Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) Plaintiff Hyflux Unitech (Shanghai) Co, Ltd Plaintiff Hyflux Utility (Oman) Pte Ltd Plaintiff Hyflux Utility (TJ) Limited Plaintiff Hyflux Water Trust Management Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) Plaintiff Menaspring Utility (S) Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) Plaintiff Menaspring Utility (Tlemcen) Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) Plaintiff Newspring Utility Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) Plaintiff Qurayyat Desalination SAOC Plaintiff Sinolac (Huludao) Biotech Co, Ltd Plaintiff Sinospring Utility Ltd (in liquidation) Plaintiff Spring China Utility Ltd (in liquidation) Plaintiff Tianjin Dagang Newspring Co, Ltd Plaintiff Tuasone Environmental Engineering Pte Ltd Plaintiff Tuasone Pte Ltd Plaintiff Tuaspring Pte Ltd (under receivership) Plaintiff Cosimo Borrelli Plaintiff Lum Ooi Lin Defendant

Case Significance

Hyflux Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) and 36 others v Lum Ooi Lin [2024] SGHC 84 is a decision of the General Division of the High Court (Suit No 267 of 2022, Summons No 56 of 2024), delivered by Goh Yihan J on 25 March 2024. The plaintiffs were 37 parties led by Hyflux Ltd (in compulsory liquidation), and including numerous Hyflux group entities in liquidation, receivership or otherwise, together with Cosimo Borrelli; the defendant was Lum Ooi Lin. The plaintiffs were represented by counsel from Kenneth Tan Partnership and Tan Kok Quan Partnership, while the defendant was represented by counsel from Davinder Singh Chambers LLC and TSMP Law Corporation. According to the catchwords, the case concerned civil procedure relating to the consolidation of parties.

Summary

Hyflux Ltd (in compulsory liquidation), numerous related entities and an additional plaintiff brought suits against a defendant, and the matter before the General Division of the High Court concerned applications relating to the consolidation of parties or proceedings. The catchwords identify the issue as one of civil procedure concerning the consolidation of parties. The provided excerpt records the judge's observations on the assistance rendered by counsel's oral submissions but does not set out the court's disposition of the applications.

What did Hyflux Ltd v Lum Ooi Lin [2024] SGHC 84 concern?

Decided by Goh Yihan J on 25 March 2024, the matter involved 37 plaintiffs led by Hyflux Ltd (in compulsory liquidation), including numerous Hyflux group entities and Cosimo Borrelli, against the defendant Lum Ooi Lin. According to the catchwords, it concerned civil procedure relating to the consolidation of parties.

Who were the parties in [2024] SGHC 84?

The plaintiffs were 37 parties led by Hyflux Ltd (in compulsory liquidation), and the defendant was Lum Ooi Lin. The plaintiffs were represented by Kenneth Tan Partnership and Tan Kok Quan Partnership, and the defendant by Davinder Singh Chambers LLC and TSMP Law Corporation.

Statutes Cited

Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act Cases on this Act →
Restructuring and Dissolution Act Cases on this Act →

Cases Cited (8)

SG (3)
[2023] SGHC 192 [2023] SGHC 44 [2023] SGHC 75
SLR (3)
[1997] 2 SLR(R) 141 [2018] 5 SLR 431 [2023] 5 SLR 513
AU (1)
[1998] WASC 361
MY (1)
[2022] 7 MLJ 883

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 84)