Leading Civil Procedure Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

466 reported cases · January 2023 to June 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Civil Procedure?

Singapore courts issued 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (242), of the 127 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (39), the median monetary award recorded was $16,000. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 466 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (81) · 2025 (117) · 2024 (125) · 2023 (143)
By court SGHC (242) · SGHCR (76) · SGHC(I) (40) · SGHC(A) (39) · SGCA (32) · SGDC (15) · SGHCF (10) · SGCA(I) (6) · SGMC (4) · SGFC (1) · SGSCT (1)
Outcomes (127 parseable) Appeal dismissed (39) · Appeal allowed (37) · Application dismissed (32) · Application allowed (7) · Application granted (4) · Claim dismissed (4) · Claim allowed (2) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1) · Judgment for the respondent (1)
Median monetary award $16,000 (across 12 awards)
Most active counsel Charlene Wee Swee Ting (9) · Thio Shen Yi (9) · Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen (8) · Ong Boon Hwee William (8) · T Abirami (8)

Compiled from 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to June 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (61 cases), Thio Shen Yi is the most active lawyer (13 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Civil Procedure appears in 466 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Striking out (28), Costs (24) and Stay of proceedings (14). The most active judge by reported case count is Goh Yihan (45 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (61 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Civil Procedure with 61 cases between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by WongPartnership LLP (52 cases) and Drew & Napier LLC (44 cases). 293 firms appeared in Civil Procedure cases during this period.

Who are the leading Civil Procedure lawyers in Singapore?

Thio Shen Yi is the most active Civil Procedure lawyer in Singapore with 13 case appearances between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by Jaikanth Shankar (11) and Charlene Wee Swee Ting (10).

Which judges handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Goh Yihan has handled 45 Civil Procedure cases between January 2023 and June 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Choo Han Teck (41 cases) and Steven Chong (26 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Civil Procedure cases are reported in Singapore courts?

466 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Civil Procedure, most often decided by Goh Yihan.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Civil Procedure cases?

The main sub-topics are Striking out (28), Costs (24) and Stay of proceedings (14).

Case Volume by Year

143
23
125
24
117
25
81
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 106 cases
cited in 57 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 50 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 49 cases
cited in 48 cases
cited in 45 cases
cited in 41 cases
cited in 29 cases
cited in 23 cases
cited in 18 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 9 cases
cited in 8 cases
Trustees Act (Cap 337)
cited in 7 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 6 of 19
[2025] SGHCR 28
ORO NEGRO DRILLING PTE. LTD. & 5 Ors v INTEGRADORA DE SERVICIOS PETROLEROS ORO NEGRO, S.A.P.I. DE C.V. & 6 Ors
26 August 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC 169
TERRENCE FERNANDEZ v TAN AIK HONG THOMAS
22 August 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 166
CELESTE YEO XUELI v SIN DAVID & Anor
21 August 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCR 27
NG ZHI LIANG v VOON GIE MIN
12 August 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC 154
ALPHARD MARITIME LTD. v SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED & 7 Ors
11 August 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCF 46
WVD & 2 Ors v WUR & 11 Ors
7 August 2025
SGHCF
[2025] SGHC 152
DNQ v DNR
7 August 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC(A) 11
MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD v ZHANG ZHENCHENG
6 August 2025
SGHC(A)
[2025] SGHC(I) 20
DOI v DOJ & 2 Ors
6 August 2025
SGHC(I)
[2025] SGHCR 26
EXCHANGE UNION COMPANY & 3 Ors v WO QI & 11 Ors
5 August 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC 150
STRACO LEISURE PTE. LTD. v SUMITOMO (SHI) CYCLO DRIVE ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD.
5 August 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC(I) 21
DKB v DKC
4 August 2025
SGHC(I)
[2025] SGHC 148
Singapore Medical Council
1 August 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCR 25
ALEKSANDR VIKTOROVICH PROSETSKII v IGOR SMIRNOV & 2 Ors
30 July 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC 143
ENVY ASSET MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) & 5 Ors v NG YU ZHI & 3 Ors
29 July 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCR 24
DYNAMIC OIL TRADING (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (IN CREDITORS’ VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION AND RECEIVERSHIP) v DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
25 July 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGCA 36
Continental Shipping Line Pte. Ltd. v Jonathan John Shipping Ltd
23 July 2025
SGCA
[2025] SGCA 35
SINGAPORE COMMODITIES GROUP CO., PTE. LTD. v FOUNDER GROUP (HONG KONG) LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
21 July 2025
SGCA
[2025] SGHCR 23
LE NINH TIEN v RAINBOW FOREST ENTERPRISES LIMITED & 5 Ors
18 July 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC 138
Hertel Singapore Pte Ltd (n.k.a. Altrad Services Singapore Pte Ltd) & Anor v Cheng Swee Guan & 6 Ors
18 July 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC(I) 18
TERRAFORM LABS PTE. LTD.
11 July 2025
SGHC(I)
[2025] SGHC 128
Madison Pacific Trust Limited & 3 Ors v David Salim & Anor
7 July 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGCA 32
Wuhu Ruyi Xinbo Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership) v European Topsoho S.àr.l.
4 July 2025
SGCA
[2025] SGHCR 21
Palyanitsa Ltd v Bridgetower Capital Ltd
4 July 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC 125
Diana Foo v Woo Mui Chan
2 July 2025
SGHC

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.