Leading Civil Procedure Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

466 reported cases · January 2023 to June 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Civil Procedure?

Singapore courts issued 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (242), of the 127 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (39), the median monetary award recorded was $16,000. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 466 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (81) · 2025 (117) · 2024 (125) · 2023 (143)
By court SGHC (242) · SGHCR (76) · SGHC(I) (40) · SGHC(A) (39) · SGCA (32) · SGDC (15) · SGHCF (10) · SGCA(I) (6) · SGMC (4) · SGFC (1) · SGSCT (1)
Outcomes (127 parseable) Appeal dismissed (39) · Appeal allowed (37) · Application dismissed (32) · Application allowed (7) · Application granted (4) · Claim dismissed (4) · Claim allowed (2) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1) · Judgment for the respondent (1)
Median monetary award $16,000 (across 12 awards)
Most active counsel Charlene Wee Swee Ting (9) · Thio Shen Yi (9) · Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen (8) · Ong Boon Hwee William (8) · T Abirami (8)

Compiled from 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to June 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (61 cases), Thio Shen Yi is the most active lawyer (13 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Civil Procedure appears in 466 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Striking out (28), Costs (24) and Stay of proceedings (14). The most active judge by reported case count is Goh Yihan (45 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (61 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Civil Procedure with 61 cases between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by WongPartnership LLP (52 cases) and Drew & Napier LLC (44 cases). 293 firms appeared in Civil Procedure cases during this period.

Who are the leading Civil Procedure lawyers in Singapore?

Thio Shen Yi is the most active Civil Procedure lawyer in Singapore with 13 case appearances between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by Jaikanth Shankar (11) and Charlene Wee Swee Ting (10).

Which judges handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Goh Yihan has handled 45 Civil Procedure cases between January 2023 and June 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Choo Han Teck (41 cases) and Steven Chong (26 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Civil Procedure cases are reported in Singapore courts?

466 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Civil Procedure, most often decided by Goh Yihan.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Civil Procedure cases?

The main sub-topics are Striking out (28), Costs (24) and Stay of proceedings (14).

Case Volume by Year

143
23
125
24
117
25
81
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 106 cases
cited in 57 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 50 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 49 cases
cited in 48 cases
cited in 45 cases
cited in 41 cases
cited in 29 cases
cited in 23 cases
cited in 18 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 9 cases
cited in 8 cases
Trustees Act (Cap 337)
cited in 7 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 17 of 19
[2023] SGHC 198
INTERACTIVE DIGITAL FINANCE LIMITED & Anor v CREDIT SUISSE AG & Anor
24 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCR 23
DFD v DFE & Anor
20 July 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHC 193
Hon G v Tan Pei Li
19 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 194
TEY LENG YEN v MAI XUN YAO
19 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 195
Razer (Asia-Pacific) Pte. Ltd. v Capgemini Singapore Pte. Ltd.
19 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 192
HO CHEE KIAN v HO KWEK SIN
18 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 189
FOO KOK BOON v NGOW KHEONG SHEN & 2 Ors
12 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC(A) 25
RAMESH VANGAL v INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
10 July 2023
SGHC(A)
[2023] SGCA 21
HOW WENG FAN & 2 Ors v PASIR RIS-PUNGGOL TOWN COUNCIL
7 July 2023
SGCA
[2023] SGHC(A) 24
REX LAM PAKI v PNG SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM LIMITED
4 July 2023
SGHC(A)
[2023] SGHC 183
DENIYAL BIN KAMIS v MAPO ENGINEERING PTE LTD & 2 Ors
4 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCR 8
The Management Corporation - Strata Title Plan No. 4572 v Kingsford Development Pte. Ltd. & 3 Ors
30 June 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHC(I) 11
CZT v CZU
28 June 2023
SGHC(I)
[2023] SGHC(A) 22
ZHANG LAN v LA DOLCE VITA FINE DINING GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED
27 June 2023
SGHC(A)
[2023] SGHC 178
Cova Group Holdings Ltd v Advanced Submarine Networks Pte. Ltd. & Anor
27 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 172
LIAN CHEE KEK BUDDHIST TEMPLE v ONG AI MOI & 2 Ors
19 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCR 7
GUANGHUA SS HOLDINGS LIMITED v LIM YEW CHENG & Anor
15 June 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGCA(I) 4
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA v DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
9 June 2023
SGCA(I)
[2023] SGHC 164
Horizon Capital Fund v Ollech David
8 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC(A) 21
PURNIMA ANIL SALGAOCAR v LAKSHMI ANIL SALGAOCAR suing as the Administratrix of the ESTATE OF ANIL VASSUDEVA SALGAOCAR deceased
5 June 2023
SGHC(A)
[2023] SGHCR 6
AW CHEE PENG v AW CHEE LOO
5 June 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHC 161
HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD v CENOBIA MAJELLA CHETTIAR
1 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 160
SW TRUSTEES PRIVATE LIMITED (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION) & Anor v TEODROS ASHENAFI TESEMMA & 5 Ors
31 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCR 5
TARUN HOTCHAND CHAINANI v AVINDERPAL SINGH S/O RANJIT SINGH & 2 Ors
30 May 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHC 153
PARASTATE LABS, INC. v WANG LI & 3 Ors
26 May 2023
SGHC

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.