Leading Civil Procedure Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

466 reported cases · January 2023 to June 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Civil Procedure?

Singapore courts issued 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (242), of the 127 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (39), the median monetary award recorded was $16,000. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 466 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (81) · 2025 (117) · 2024 (125) · 2023 (143)
By court SGHC (242) · SGHCR (76) · SGHC(I) (40) · SGHC(A) (39) · SGCA (32) · SGDC (15) · SGHCF (10) · SGCA(I) (6) · SGMC (4) · SGFC (1) · SGSCT (1)
Outcomes (127 parseable) Appeal dismissed (39) · Appeal allowed (37) · Application dismissed (32) · Application allowed (7) · Application granted (4) · Claim dismissed (4) · Claim allowed (2) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1) · Judgment for the respondent (1)
Median monetary award $16,000 (across 12 awards)
Most active counsel Charlene Wee Swee Ting (9) · Thio Shen Yi (9) · Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen (8) · Ong Boon Hwee William (8) · T Abirami (8)

Compiled from 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to June 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (61 cases), Thio Shen Yi is the most active lawyer (13 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Civil Procedure appears in 466 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Striking out (28), Costs (24) and Stay of proceedings (14). The most active judge by reported case count is Goh Yihan (45 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (61 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Civil Procedure with 61 cases between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by WongPartnership LLP (52 cases) and Drew & Napier LLC (44 cases). 293 firms appeared in Civil Procedure cases during this period.

Who are the leading Civil Procedure lawyers in Singapore?

Thio Shen Yi is the most active Civil Procedure lawyer in Singapore with 13 case appearances between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by Jaikanth Shankar (11) and Charlene Wee Swee Ting (10).

Which judges handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Goh Yihan has handled 45 Civil Procedure cases between January 2023 and June 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Choo Han Teck (41 cases) and Steven Chong (26 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Civil Procedure cases are reported in Singapore courts?

466 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Civil Procedure, most often decided by Goh Yihan.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Civil Procedure cases?

The main sub-topics are Striking out (28), Costs (24) and Stay of proceedings (14).

Case Volume by Year

143
23
125
24
117
25
81
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 106 cases
cited in 57 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 50 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 49 cases
cited in 48 cases
cited in 45 cases
cited in 41 cases
cited in 29 cases
cited in 23 cases
cited in 18 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 9 cases
cited in 8 cases
Trustees Act (Cap 337)
cited in 7 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 16 of 19
[2023] SGHCR 15
XIANG DA MARINE PTE. LTD. (IN CREDITORS' VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION) & ANOR V ZHANG XIANMING & 4 ORS
7 September 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHC 238
JOHAN DANIEL BLOMBERG v KHAN ZHI YAN
30 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCR 14
ART ASK AGENCY S.L. v PERSON(S) UNKNOWN RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OPERATION OF E-COMMERCE STORE AT URL “HTTPS://WLDAFENGUAN.ALIEXPRESS.COM/STORE/3254015” WITH SELLER ALIAS “LXS-WL STORE” & 243 Ors
28 August 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHCR 13
GILLINGHAM JAMES IAN v FEARLESS LEGENDS PTE. LTD & 3 Ors
25 August 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHC 230
AROKIASAMY STEVEN JOSEPH & Anor v LEE BOON CHUAN NELSON & 2 Ors
25 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 234
LEONG QUEE CHING KAREN v LIM SOON HUAT & 5 Ors
23 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCF 37
WPA v WPB & 3 Ors
22 August 2023
SGHCF
[2023] SGHC 228
Santoso Winoto v Suseno Winoto & Anor
18 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 227
ASIAN ECO TECHNOLOGY PTE. LTD. v DENG YIMING
17 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCR 12
Chang Chee Kheo v Fatfish Investment Partners Pte. Ltd. & 2 Ors
16 August 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHC 223
RIVIERA CO., LTD. v TOSHIO MASUI
16 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 222
LIM OON KUIN & 2 Ors v Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP
15 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGCA 24
KOH KIEN CHON (GU JIANCONG) & Anor v DING ASSET LTD
11 August 2023
SGCA
[2023] SGHC 212
Singapore Medical Council
4 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 213
Singapore Medical Council
4 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 216
WANG PIAO V LEE WEE CHING
4 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 209
CRESCENDAS BIONICS PTE LTD v JURONG PRIMEWIDE PTE LTD
3 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCR 11
DANIEL KROLL v CYBERDYNE TECH EXCHANGE PTE LTD & 3 Ors
2 August 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHC 208
LIN YUEH HUNG & Anor v ANDREAS VOGEL & PARTNER, RECHTSANWAELTE, AV & P LEGAL LLP & 2 Ors
2 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 206
ILC CO., LTD. v SAITAMA HIROSHI & 3 Ors
1 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCR 10
CHYE HWA LUAN & 2 Ors v DO ALLYN T
31 July 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHC 205
PRO-ACTIVE ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. v PRIME STRUCTURES ENGINEERING PTE LTD
31 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCF 33
WKK v WKL
25 July 2023
SGHCF
[2023] SGHC 199
BYBIT FINTECH LIMITED V HO KAI XIN & 5 ORS
25 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCR 9
H8 HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. v RIC DORMITORY (SG) PTE. LTD. & 3 Ors
24 July 2023
SGHCR

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.