Leading Civil Procedure Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

521 reported cases · January 2023 to October 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Civil Procedure?

Singapore courts issued 521 reported Civil Procedure judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (261), of the 139 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (42), the median monetary award recorded was $16,000. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 521 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (136) · 2025 (117) · 2024 (125) · 2023 (143)
By court SGHC (261) · SGHCR (90) · SGHC(I) (47) · SGHC(A) (43) · SGCA (32) · SGDC (22) · SGHCF (11) · SGMC (7) · SGCA(I) (6) · SGFC (1) · SGSCT (1)
Outcomes (139 parseable) Appeal dismissed (42) · Appeal allowed (38) · Application dismissed (35) · Application allowed (10) · Claim dismissed (5) · Application granted (4) · Claim allowed (2) · Claim granted (1) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1) · Judgment for the respondent (1)
Median monetary award $16,000 (across 12 awards)
Most active counsel Thio Shen Yi (16) · Charlene Wee Swee Ting (11) · Jaikanth Shankar (11) · Ng Ka Luon Eddee (11) · Jordan Tan (10)

Compiled from 521 reported Civil Procedure judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 521 reported Civil Procedure judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to October 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (66 cases), Thio Shen Yi is the most active lawyer (16 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Civil Procedure appears in 521 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Striking out (33), Costs (28) and Summary judgment (17). The most active judge by reported case count is Goh Yihan (45 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (66 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Civil Procedure with 66 cases between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by WongPartnership LLP (56 cases) and Drew & Napier LLC (55 cases). 316 firms appeared in Civil Procedure cases during this period.

Who are the leading Civil Procedure lawyers in Singapore?

Thio Shen Yi is the most active Civil Procedure lawyer in Singapore with 16 case appearances between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Jaikanth Shankar (11) and Charlene Wee Swee Ting (11).

Which judges handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Goh Yihan has handled 45 Civil Procedure cases between January 2023 and October 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Choo Han Teck (41 cases) and Woo Bih Li (27 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Civil Procedure cases are reported in Singapore courts?

521 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Civil Procedure, most often decided by Goh Yihan.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Civil Procedure cases?

The main sub-topics are Striking out (33), Costs (28) and Summary judgment (17).

Case Volume by Year

143
23
125
24
117
25
136
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 111 cases
cited in 64 cases
cited in 52 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 51 cases
cited in 51 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 50 cases
cited in 49 cases
cited in 35 cases
cited in 30 cases
cited in 20 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 10 cases
Penal Code (Cap 224)
cited in 8 cases
cited in 8 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 21 of 21
[2023] SGHC 64
TG MASTER PTE. LTD. v TUNG KEE DEVELOPMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD & Anor
20 March 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCF 13
VWB v VWA
14 March 2023
SGHCF
[2023] SGHC 56
CHIA SOO KIANG (SUING AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE AND SUCCESSOR OF TAN YAW LAN, DECEASED) v TAN TOCK SENG HOSPITAL PTE. LTD. & 3 Ors
10 March 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 53
CHENG HOE SOON v EZEKIEL PETER LATIMER formerly practicing in the style of M/S PETER EZEKIEL & CO
3 March 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 52
MAH KIAT SENG v ATTORNEY-GENERAL & 2 Ors
3 March 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 49
LAKSHMI ANIL SALGAOCAR suing as the Administratrix of the ESTATE OF ANIL VASSUDEVA SALGAOCAR deceased v PURNIMA ANIL SALGAOCAR
28 February 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 44
YEO SU LAN (YANG SHULAN) v THOMAS HONG & 2 Ors
24 February 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 42
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK v SEABULK INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SEABULK SYSTEMS INC.) & 2 Ors
23 February 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGCA 7
TAN BENG HUI CAROLYN v The Law Society of Singapore
22 February 2023
SGCA
[2023] SGCA 6
MILAHA EXPLORER PTE. LTD. v PENGRUI LEASING (TIANJIN) CO. LTD.
20 February 2023
SGCA
[2023] SGHCF 6
WKK v WKL
16 February 2023
SGHCF
[2023] SGHC 31
Pharma Inc. (Wordwide) Pte. Ltd. v Limb Salvage And Revision Arthroplasty Surgery Pte Ltd
13 February 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 24
CSO v CSP & Anor
8 February 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 27
JIANGSU NEW HUAMING INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO., LTD. v PT. MUSIM MAS & Anor
6 February 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC(A) 7
WDT v WDS
6 February 2023
SGHC(A)
[2023] SGHC 26
Tsudakoma Corp. v Global Trade Well Pte Ltd
3 February 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC(A) 5
NEWSPAPER SENG LOGISTICS PTE. LTD. v CHIAP SENG PRODUCTIONS PTE LTD
2 February 2023
SGHC(A)
[2023] SGHCR 1
TA PRIVATE CAPITAL SECURITY AGENT LIMITED & Anor v UD TRADING GROUP HOLDING PTE. LTD. & Anor
30 January 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHC 15
NEVERLAND INVESTMENT HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. v P.T PTE. LIMITED & 2 Ors
20 January 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGCA 1
ANUPAM MITTAL v WESTBRIDGE VENTURES II INVESTMENT HOLDINGS
6 January 2023
SGCA
[2023] SGHC(A) 1
RODEO POWER PTE LTD & 3 Ors v TONG SEAK KAN & Anor
5 January 2023
SGHC(A)

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.