Leading Civil Procedure Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore
521 reported cases · January 2023 to October 2026
Updated
What did Singapore courts decide in Civil Procedure?
Singapore courts issued 521 reported Civil Procedure judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (261), of the 139 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (42), the median monetary award recorded was $16,000. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.
Compiled from 521 reported Civil Procedure judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.
Outcome data updated
Across 521 reported Civil Procedure judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to October 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (66 cases), Thio Shen Yi is the most active lawyer (16 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.
Overview
Civil Procedure appears in 521 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Striking out (33), Costs (28) and Summary judgment (17). The most active judge by reported case count is Goh Yihan (45 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (66 cases).
Which law firms handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Civil Procedure with 66 cases between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by WongPartnership LLP (56 cases) and Drew & Napier LLC (55 cases). 316 firms appeared in Civil Procedure cases during this period.
Who are the leading Civil Procedure lawyers in Singapore?
Thio Shen Yi is the most active Civil Procedure lawyer in Singapore with 16 case appearances between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Jaikanth Shankar (11) and Charlene Wee Swee Ting (11).
Which judges handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?
Goh Yihan has handled 45 Civil Procedure cases between January 2023 and October 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Choo Han Teck (41 cases) and Woo Bih Li (27 cases) are also among the most active.
How many Civil Procedure cases are reported in Singapore courts?
521 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Civil Procedure, most often decided by Goh Yihan.
What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Civil Procedure cases?
The main sub-topics are Striking out (33), Costs (28) and Summary judgment (17).
Case Volume by Year
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Striking out 33 cases
Costs 28 cases
Summary judgment 17 cases
Pleadings — Striking out 15 cases
Appeals — Leave 14 cases
Costs — Security 14 cases
Stay of proceedings 14 cases
Extension of time 13 cases
Pleadings — Amendment 13 cases
Judgments and orders 11 cases
Costs — Principles 9 cases
Pleadings 9 cases
Mareva injunctions 8 cases
Service 8 cases
Appeals — Adducing fresh evidence on appeal 7 cases
Amendments 7 cases
Inherent powers 6 cases
Production of documents 5 cases
Striking Out 5 cases
Damages — Interest 5 cases
Pleadings — Further and better particulars 5 cases
Production of documents — Private or internal correspondence 4 cases
Appeals 4 cases
Appeals — Permission 4 cases
Injunctions 4 cases
No case to answer 4 cases
Discovery of documents — Specific discovery 4 cases
Parties — Joinder 4 cases
Costs — Indemnity costs 3 cases
Mareva injunctions — Real risk of dissipation 3 cases
Key Statutes
Court Distribution
Cases
Page 19 of 21Methodology & disclaimer
Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.