Leading Civil Procedure Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

521 reported cases · January 2023 to October 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Civil Procedure?

Singapore courts issued 521 reported Civil Procedure judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (261), of the 139 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (42), the median monetary award recorded was $16,000. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 521 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (136) · 2025 (117) · 2024 (125) · 2023 (143)
By court SGHC (261) · SGHCR (90) · SGHC(I) (47) · SGHC(A) (43) · SGCA (32) · SGDC (22) · SGHCF (11) · SGMC (7) · SGCA(I) (6) · SGFC (1) · SGSCT (1)
Outcomes (139 parseable) Appeal dismissed (42) · Appeal allowed (38) · Application dismissed (35) · Application allowed (10) · Claim dismissed (5) · Application granted (4) · Claim allowed (2) · Claim granted (1) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1) · Judgment for the respondent (1)
Median monetary award $16,000 (across 12 awards)
Most active counsel Thio Shen Yi (16) · Charlene Wee Swee Ting (11) · Jaikanth Shankar (11) · Ng Ka Luon Eddee (11) · Jordan Tan (10)

Compiled from 521 reported Civil Procedure judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 521 reported Civil Procedure judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to October 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (66 cases), Thio Shen Yi is the most active lawyer (16 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Civil Procedure appears in 521 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Striking out (33), Costs (28) and Summary judgment (17). The most active judge by reported case count is Goh Yihan (45 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (66 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Civil Procedure with 66 cases between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by WongPartnership LLP (56 cases) and Drew & Napier LLC (55 cases). 316 firms appeared in Civil Procedure cases during this period.

Who are the leading Civil Procedure lawyers in Singapore?

Thio Shen Yi is the most active Civil Procedure lawyer in Singapore with 16 case appearances between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Jaikanth Shankar (11) and Charlene Wee Swee Ting (11).

Which judges handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Goh Yihan has handled 45 Civil Procedure cases between January 2023 and October 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Choo Han Teck (41 cases) and Woo Bih Li (27 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Civil Procedure cases are reported in Singapore courts?

521 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Civil Procedure, most often decided by Goh Yihan.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Civil Procedure cases?

The main sub-topics are Striking out (33), Costs (28) and Summary judgment (17).

Case Volume by Year

143
23
125
24
117
25
136
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 111 cases
cited in 64 cases
cited in 52 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 51 cases
cited in 51 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 50 cases
cited in 49 cases
cited in 35 cases
cited in 30 cases
cited in 20 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 10 cases
Penal Code (Cap 224)
cited in 8 cases
cited in 8 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 19 of 21
[2023] SGHC 205
PRO-ACTIVE ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. v PRIME STRUCTURES ENGINEERING PTE LTD
31 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCR 10
CHYE HWA LUAN & 2 Ors v DO ALLYN T
31 July 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHC 199
BYBIT FINTECH LIMITED V HO KAI XIN & 5 ORS
25 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCF 33
WKK v WKL
25 July 2023
SGHCF
[2023] SGHC 198
INTERACTIVE DIGITAL FINANCE LIMITED & Anor v CREDIT SUISSE AG & Anor
24 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCR 9
H8 HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. v RIC DORMITORY (SG) PTE. LTD. & 3 Ors
24 July 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHCR 23
DFD v DFE & Anor
20 July 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHC 195
Razer (Asia-Pacific) Pte. Ltd. v Capgemini Singapore Pte. Ltd.
19 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 194
TEY LENG YEN v MAI XUN YAO
19 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 193
Hon G v Tan Pei Li
19 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 192
HO CHEE KIAN v HO KWEK SIN
18 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 189
FOO KOK BOON v NGOW KHEONG SHEN & 2 Ors
12 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC(A) 25
RAMESH VANGAL v INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
10 July 2023
SGHC(A)
[2023] SGCA 21
HOW WENG FAN & 2 Ors v PASIR RIS-PUNGGOL TOWN COUNCIL
7 July 2023
SGCA
[2023] SGHC 183
DENIYAL BIN KAMIS v MAPO ENGINEERING PTE LTD & 2 Ors
4 July 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC(A) 24
REX LAM PAKI v PNG SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM LIMITED
4 July 2023
SGHC(A)
[2023] SGHCR 8
The Management Corporation - Strata Title Plan No. 4572 v Kingsford Development Pte. Ltd. & 3 Ors
30 June 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGHC(I) 11
CZT v CZU
28 June 2023
SGHC(I)
[2023] SGHC 178
Cova Group Holdings Ltd v Advanced Submarine Networks Pte. Ltd. & Anor
27 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC(A) 22
ZHANG LAN v LA DOLCE VITA FINE DINING GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED
27 June 2023
SGHC(A)
[2023] SGHC 172
LIAN CHEE KEK BUDDHIST TEMPLE v ONG AI MOI & 2 Ors
19 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCR 7
GUANGHUA SS HOLDINGS LIMITED v LIM YEW CHENG & Anor
15 June 2023
SGHCR
[2023] SGCA(I) 4
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA v DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
9 June 2023
SGCA(I)
[2023] SGHC 164
Horizon Capital Fund v Ollech David
8 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHCR 6
AW CHEE PENG v AW CHEE LOO
5 June 2023
SGHCR

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.