Leading Insolvency Law Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

177 reported cases · January 2023 to September 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Insolvency Law?

Singapore courts issued 177 reported Insolvency Law judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (128), of the 43 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (17), the median monetary award recorded was $31,500. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 177 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (31) · 2025 (43) · 2024 (60) · 2023 (43)
By court SGHC (128) · SGCA (22) · SGHCR (16) · SGHC(A) (5) · SGHC(I) (5) · SGHCF (1)
Outcomes (43 parseable) Appeal dismissed (17) · Appeal allowed (9) · Application dismissed (6) · Application granted (5) · Application allowed (3) · Claim dismissed (2) · Acquitted (1)
Median monetary award $31,500 (across 4 awards)

Compiled from 177 reported Insolvency Law judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 177 reported Insolvency Law judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to September 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (30 cases), Han Guangyuan Keith is the most active lawyer (13 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Insolvency Law appears in 177 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Cross-border insolvency — Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings (8), Avoidance of transactions — Transactions at an undervalue (8) and Winding up — Grounds for petition (7). The most active judge by reported case count is Goh Yihan (36 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (30 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Insolvency Law cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Insolvency Law with 30 cases between January 2023 and September 2026, followed by Allen & Gledhill LLP (29 cases) and Shook Lin & Bok LLP (28 cases). 146 firms appeared in Insolvency Law cases during this period.

Who are the leading Insolvency Law lawyers in Singapore?

Han Guangyuan Keith is the most active Insolvency Law lawyer in Singapore with 13 case appearances between January 2023 and September 2026, followed by Lye Yu Min (9) and Yeo Alexander Lawrence Han Tiong (8).

Which judges handle the most Insolvency Law cases in Singapore?

Goh Yihan has handled 36 Insolvency Law cases between January 2023 and September 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Kannan Ramesh (20 cases) and Sundaresh Menon (16 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Insolvency Law cases are reported in Singapore courts?

177 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Insolvency Law, most often decided by Goh Yihan.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Insolvency Law cases?

The main sub-topics are Cross-border insolvency — Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings (8), Avoidance of transactions — Transactions at an undervalue (8) and Winding up — Grounds for petition (7).

Case Volume by Year

43
23
60
24
43
25
31
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 163 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 162 cases
cited in 91 cases
cited in 36 cases
Insolvency Act
cited in 16 cases
cited in 14 cases
cited in 13 cases
cited in 12 cases
cited in 9 cases
cited in 8 cases
UK Insolvency Act
cited in 8 cases
cited in 6 cases
cited in 6 cases
Australian Corporations Act
cited in 6 cases
cited in 5 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 1 of 8
[2026] SGHC 203
Lim Siang Heng v Great Eastern Financial Advisers Private Limited
30 September 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC(I) 19
DYX v DYY
17 September 2026
SGHC(I)
[2026] SGHC 176
GOH SENG HENG v OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE
31 August 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHCR 38
NADARAJAN S/O CHIDAMBARAM v ESWARI D/O NATARAJAN
26 August 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHC(I) 16
PT SRI REJEKI ISMAN TBK & 7 Ors
26 August 2026
SGHC(I)
[2026] SGHCR 34
D & J MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. v TAN HOCK KENG
17 August 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHCR 33
Re: DEEPAK MISHRA
14 August 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGCA 32
REN XINWU v HOMING HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. (in liquidation) & Anor
16 July 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGHC 146
MIRROR TRADING INTERNATIONAL (PTY) LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) & 7 Ors
15 July 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHCR 23
Re: See Chuen Lim, Alvin (Shu Quanlin, Alvin)
1 July 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHC 138
AQCEL SYNERGIES (HONG KONG) LIMITED v LIBERTY INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS PTE. LTD.
30 June 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGCA 28
Lau Lee Sheng and others v Envy Asset Management Pte Ltd (in liquidation) and others and another appeal
22 June 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGHC 102
In re oCap Management Pte Ltd (in Liquidation)
13 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGCA 24
SINGAPORE COMMODITIES GROUP CO., PTE. LTD. v FOUNDER GROUP (HONG KONG) LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
8 May 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGHCR 13
GOH CHIN CHENG v CHOCO UP SG PTE LTD
4 May 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHC 93
TRUE YOGA PTE LTD & 2 Ors v PATRICK JOHN WEE EWE SENG
30 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 94
MATTHEW BENJAMIN CAPE V JOHN CHARLES COLLIS & 8 ORS
30 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHCF 10
WZY v OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE & Anor
15 April 2026
SGHCF
[2026] SGHC 75
Re: DA SHUN SHIPPING (PTE.) LTD.
8 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC(A) 9
LEE YIH KANG v HSU SHIH HSUN
1 April 2026
SGHC(A)
[2026] SGHCR 8
Lim Siang Heng v Great Eastern Financial Advisers Private Limited
26 March 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHC 61
Re: ALSEN CHANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
19 March 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGCA 12
Blackstone Asia Real Estate Partners Limited (In Liquidation) & 2 Ors v Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited
11 March 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGHCR 6
MATTHEW BENJAMIN CAPE V JOHN CHARLES COLLIS & 8 ORS
5 March 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGCA 9
PARK HOTEL GROUP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. v AW ENG HAI & 2 Ors
4 March 2026
SGCA

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.