CHEN WEIWEN KELVIN v DBS BANK LTD & Anor
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHCR 13 is a High Court Registrar decision dated 8 May 2025 concerning Insolvency Law, specifically addressing bankruptcy. The judgment was delivered by Samuel Chan. Legal representation was provided by Fortis Law Corporation. The judgment cites 8 cases (5 Singapore, 3 foreign) and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Companies Act, the Insolvency, and the Restructuring and Dissolution Act.
Summary
The CEO and founder of EUDA Health Holdings, a NASDAQ-listed company, sought an interim order for a proposed voluntary arrangement under Part 14 of the IRDA and an eight-month moratorium, owing approximately $1.5 million to credit card issuers. The court dismissed the application, finding the applicant had not shown any proposal that had a real prospect of being implemented and approved by creditors, and had no power to grant a standalone eight-month moratorium.
What was decided in [2025] SGHCR 13?
[2025] SGHCR 13 (CHEN WEIWEN KELVIN v DBS BANK LTD & Anor) is a High Court Registrar decision from 8 May 2025 addressing Insolvency Law, specifically bankruptcy. The judgment was delivered by Samuel Chan.
Which judge decided [2025] SGHCR 13?
[2025] SGHCR 13 was delivered by Samuel Chan in the High Court Registrar on 8 May 2025. The case concerned Insolvency Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHCR 13 cite?
[2025] SGHCR 13 cites 8 prior decisions, including 3 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Companies Act, Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (8)
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHCR 13)