M

Mak Sushan Melissa

Allen & Gledhill LLP · 2023–2026 Called to the Bar in 2015 6 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Mak Sushan Melissa. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Mak Sushan Melissa appears as counsel of record in 6 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the SGHC(A).

Reported cases
6
Courts
SGHC(A), SGCA(I), SGHC(I)
Period
May 2023 to June 2026

Source: derived from 6 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Mak Sushan Melissa — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

Mak Sushan Melissa's reported litigation record covers 6 Singapore court cases (2023–2026). The cases below set out Mak Sushan Melissa's role as counsel, the parties involved, and what each court decided.

About Mak Sushan Melissa

Mak Sushan Melissa appears as counsel of record in 6 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). These were heard before SGHC(A) (2), SGCA(I) (2) and SGHC(I) (2).

What areas of law does Mak Sushan Melissa practice?

Mak Sushan Melissa appeared most frequently in Contract (2 cases), Trusts (2 cases), and Companies (1 case) between May 2023 and June 2026, across 6 total case appearances in Singapore courts.

Contract 2 cases

Mak Sushan Melissa appeared as counsel in 2 Contract cases between July 2023 and June 2026.

Trusts 2 cases

Mak Sushan Melissa appeared as counsel in 2 Trusts cases between May 2023 and July 2023.

How many cases has Mak Sushan Melissa appeared in?

Mak Sushan Melissa appears as counsel of record in 6 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026).

Which courts does Mak Sushan Melissa appear in?

Mak Sushan Melissa appears before SGHC(A) (2), SGCA(I) (2) and SGHC(I) (2).

6
Appearances
2015
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the appellant (3)

Counsel for the defendant (2)

Counsel for the respondent (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →