I

Isaac Tito Shane

Tito Isaac & Co LLP · 2023–2026 Called to the Bar in 1995 7 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Isaac Tito Shane. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Isaac Tito Shane appears as counsel of record in 7 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the SGHC.

Reported cases
7
Courts
SGHC, SGCA
Period
October 2023 to May 2026

Source: derived from 7 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Isaac Tito Shane — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

Isaac Tito Shane's reported litigation record covers 7 Singapore court cases (2023–2026). The cases below set out Isaac Tito Shane's role as counsel, the parties involved, and what each court decided.

About Isaac Tito Shane

Isaac Tito Shane appears as counsel of record in 7 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). These were heard before SGHC (5) and SGCA (2).

What areas of law does Isaac Tito Shane practice?

Isaac Tito Shane appeared most frequently in Trusts (2 cases), Arbitration (2 cases), and Conflict of Laws (1 case) between October 2023 and May 2026, across 7 total case appearances in Singapore courts.

Trusts 2 cases

Isaac Tito Shane appeared as counsel in 2 Trusts cases between June 2025 and May 2026.

Arbitration 2 cases

Isaac Tito Shane appeared as counsel in 2 Arbitration cases between May 2024 and August 2024.

How many cases has Isaac Tito Shane appeared in?

Isaac Tito Shane appears as counsel of record in 7 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026).

Which courts does Isaac Tito Shane appear in?

Isaac Tito Shane appears before SGHC (5) and SGCA (2).

7
Appearances
1995
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the respondent (3)

Counsel for the claimant (1)

Counsel for the plaintiff (1)

Counsel for the first respondent (1)

Counsel for the applicant (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →