STAR ENGINEERING PTE LTD v POLLISUM ENGINEERING PTE LTD & Anor

[2024] SGCA 30 Court of Appeal 19 August 2024 CA/CA 9/2024 26 min read
10 cases cited

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

we therefore dismiss the appeal.

Source: [2024] SGCA 30, Court of Appeal, decided 19 August 2024. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court Court of Appeal
Decided
Judges Steven Chong, Sundaresh Menon
Charges / claim Arbitration
Outcome Appeal dismissed
Counsel Drew & Napier LLC, Ramdas & Wong, Tito Isaac & Co LLP, Chong Yi Mei, Hsu Bi-Wei Timothy Homer, Isaac Tito Shane, Julia Emma Dcruz, Lee Pei Hua Rachel, Li Shunhui Daniel, Tan Youliang, Tay Eu-Yen, Wong Hin Pkin Wendell, Yeo Cai Yun Kimberly

Source: [2024] SGCA 30, Court of Appeal, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (2)

Counsel (13)

Parties (3)

Case Significance

Star Engineering Pte Ltd v Pollisum Engineering Pte Ltd and another [2024] SGCA 30 was decided by the Court of Appeal on 19 August 2024, in Civil Appeal No 9 of 2024, with the judgment delivered by Sundaresh Menon CJ sitting with Steven Chong JCA, following a hearing on 10 June 2024. The appeal arose out of a dispute between the appellant, Star Engineering Pte Ltd, and the first respondent, Pollisum Engineering Pte Ltd, in HC/OA 1135/2023 and a related appeal HC/RA 4/2024, with Great Eastern General Insurance Ltd as the second respondent.

Pollisum Engineering had engaged Star Engineering as its contractor for the design, construction and maintenance of works for a construction project, and as required under the contract Star Engineering furnished an unconditional on-demand performance bond issued by Great Eastern. After disputes arose, Pollisum made a demand for payment under the bond, and Star Engineering commenced OA 1135 seeking, among other things, an order restraining Pollisum from receiving payment pursuant to that demand. The matter, falling under the catchword of arbitration and stay of court proceedings, engaged the Arbitration Act and the Civil Law Act. Star Engineering was represented by Drew & Napier LLC, with counsel including Wong Hin Pkin Wendell and Tay Eu-Yen, while the respondents were represented by Ramdas & Wong and Tito Isaac & Co LLP, with counsel including Isaac Tito Shane.

[2024] SGCA 30 explained

STAR ENGINEERING PTE LTD v POLLISUM ENGINEERING PTE LTD & Anor ([2024] SGCA 30) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Court of Appeal on 19 August 2024. It is categorised under Arbitration. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGCA 30 about?

STAR ENGINEERING PTE LTD v POLLISUM ENGINEERING PTE LTD & Anor ([2024] SGCA 30) is a Court of Appeal decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Arbitration — Stay of court proceedings”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2024] SGCA 30 consider?

The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10) and Civil Law Act (Cap 43). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

What did Star Engineering seek in Star Engineering v Pollisum Engineering [2024] SGCA 30?

Star Engineering Pte Ltd commenced HC/OA 1135/2023 seeking, among other things, an order restraining Pollisum Engineering Pte Ltd from receiving payment under an unconditional on-demand performance bond issued by Great Eastern General Insurance Ltd after Pollisum demanded payment.

Who heard the appeal in Star Engineering v Pollisum Engineering [2024] SGCA 30?

The Court of Appeal heard Civil Appeal No 9 of 2024, with Sundaresh Menon CJ delivering the judgment of the court sitting alongside Steven Chong JCA, on 19 August 2024 following a hearing on 10 June 2024.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (10)

SLR (10)
[1990] 2 SLR(R) 520 [1995] 2 SLR(R) 262 [1999] 3 SLR(R) 44 [2010] 2 SLR 329 [2012] 3 SLR 125 [2012] 3 SLR 352 [2016] 3 SLR 557 [2019] 2 SLR 295 [2023] 2 SLR 389 [2024] 3 SLR 1031

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Statutes interpreted in this judgment

Legal concepts & references

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGCA 30)