Leading Landlord and Tenant Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

12 reported cases · May 2024 to April 2026

Updated

Across 12 reported Landlord and Tenant judgments in Singapore courts (May 2024 to April 2026), Tan Kok Quan Partnership is the most active firm by reported case count (2 cases), Marina Chin Li Yuen is the most active lawyer (2 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

The dataset records 12 Landlord and Tenant judgments handed down between May 2024 and April 2026, ranking the practice area 30th of 49 tracked areas. The General Division of the High Court (SGHC) heard the most, with the Magistrates' Court (SGMC), the Appellate Division (SGHC(A)) and the District Court (SGDC) also featuring. A total of 11 judges, 25 firms and 57 lawyers appeared. The most common issues were recovery of possession through holding over with double rent (4 cases), breach of tenant's covenants (3 cases), and forfeiture on termination of leases (2 cases).

Data coverage: between May 2024 and April 2026

Which law firms handle the most Landlord and Tenant cases in Singapore?

Tan Kok Quan Partnership, Allen & Gledhill LLP and Withers KhattarWong LLP each lead in Landlord and Tenant with 2 cases between May 2024 and April 2026, followed by Meritus Law LLC and Netto & Magin LLC with 1 case each. 25 firms appeared during this period.

Who are the leading Landlord and Tenant lawyers in Singapore?

Marina Chin Li Yuen, Darren Ng Zhen Qiang and Gitta Priska Adelya each recorded 2 Landlord and Tenant appearances between May 2024 and April 2026, among the most active lawyers in the dataset, alongside Nayo Leong with 2 appearances.

Which judges handle the most Landlord and Tenant cases in Singapore?

Georgina Lum, Kwek Mean Luck and Philip Jeyaretnam have each handled 2 Landlord and Tenant cases between May 2024 and April 2026, the most of any judges in the dataset. See Kee Oon, Debbie Ong Siew Ling and Woo Bih Li each recorded 1 case.

How many Landlord and Tenant cases are heard in Singapore courts?

The dataset records 12 Landlord and Tenant judgments handed down between May 2024 and April 2026. The General Division of the High Court (SGHC) was the primary court, with cases also heard in the Magistrates' Court, Appellate Division and District Court.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Landlord and Tenant cases?

The leading sub-topics are recovery of possession through holding over with double rent (4 cases), breach of tenant's covenants (3 cases), waiver of the right to forfeiture (2 cases) and forfeiture requirements under section 18(1) of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act (2 cases).

Case Volume by Year

2
24
6
25
4
26
2024–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Termination of leases — Forfeiture — Requirements under section 18(1) of Conveyancing and Law of Property Act 2 cases

Termination of leases — Whether covenants amounted to conditions of the tenancy agreement Landlord And Tenant — Covenants — Quiet enjoyment 1 case

Recovery of possession — Reinstatement works 1 case

Creation of tenancy — Existence and nature of lease — Whether concept of repudiation and acceptance apply to leases — Whether lease was terminated 1 case

Termination of leases — Forfeiture — Repudiatory breach of the tenancy agreement 1 case

Termination of leases — Forfeiture — Requirements under s 18(1) of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act 1 case

Termination of leases — Forfeiture — Prohibition against assignment, subletting, parting with and sharing of possession and use of demised premises — s 18(8) of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act 1 case

Key Statutes

cited in 5 cases
cited in 4 cases
cited in 1 case
Moneylenders Act
cited in 1 case
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 1 case
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case
Law of Property Act
cited in 1 case
Property Law Act
cited in 1 case

Court Distribution

Cases

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.