DARYLE SEAH MING YANG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Outcome
Appeal allowedwe allowed the appeal in part by reducing the appellant’s sentence for the s 35(1) RTA offence to three weeks’ imprisonment.
Source: [2024] SGHC 152, High Court (General Division), decided 14 June 2024. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Sundaresh Menon, Tay Yong Kwang, Vincent Hoong |
| Charges / claim | Road Traffic |
| Outcome | Appeal allowed |
| Counsel | Attorney-General's Chambers, Drew & Napier LLC, M M Marican & Co, Estad Amber Joy, Huo Jiongrui, Ng Yiwen, Sean Muhammad Marican |
Source: [2024] SGHC 152, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (7)
Case Significance
Seah Ming Yang Daryle v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 152 was decided by the General Division of the High Court of Singapore on 14 June 2024, following a hearing on 18 April 2024 in Magistrate's Appeal No 9149 of 2023. The grounds of decision were delivered by Vincent Hoong J on behalf of a coram comprising Sundaresh Menon CJ, Tay Yong Kwang JCA and Vincent Hoong J. The case concerned the sentencing framework for offences under s 35(1) of the Road Traffic Act for driving without a licence. In its introduction, the court emphasised that Singapore's roads are an essential public good and that driving is an inherently communal and dangerous activity, giving rise to a collective public interest in safe driving that the road traffic laws exist to uphold. The appellant Seah Ming Yang Daryle was represented by M M Marican & Co, with the Attorney-General's Chambers appearing for the Public Prosecutor and Drew & Napier LLC acting as young independent counsel.
[2024] SGHC 152 explained
DARYLE SEAH MING YANG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ([2024] SGHC 152) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 14 June 2024. It is categorised under Road Traffic. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 2 other reported Singapore judgments, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2024] SGHC 152 about?
DARYLE SEAH MING YANG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ([2024] SGHC 152) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Road Traffic — Offences — Driving without a licence — Sentencing framework for s 35(1) RTA offences of driving without a licence”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 152 consider?
The judgment refers to Party Risks and Compensation) Act (Cap 189) and Road Traffic Act (Cap 276). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
How influential is [2024] SGHC 152?
Within this corpus, [2024] SGHC 152 has been cited by 2 later reported Singapore judgments. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
What was Seah Ming Yang Daryle v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 152 about?
It was a Magistrate's Appeal (No 9149 of 2023) heard by the General Division of the High Court of Singapore concerning the sentencing framework for offences under section 35(1) of the Road Traffic Act for driving without a licence. The grounds were delivered on 14 June 2024.
Which judges decided [2024] SGHC 152?
The coram comprised Sundaresh Menon CJ, Tay Yong Kwang JCA and Vincent Hoong J. Vincent Hoong J delivered the grounds of decision of the court on 14 June 2024, after the matter was heard on 18 April 2024 in the General Division of the High Court.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (13)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 152)