MUHAMMAD NURASHIK BIN MOHD NASIR v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (3)
Case Significance
Muhammad Nurashik bin Mohd Nasir v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 161 was an ex tempore judgment delivered in the General Division of the High Court by Vincent Hoong J on 26 June 2024, in Magistrate's Appeal No 9035 of 2024. The appellant had been charged with the commission of 17 theft and traffic offences. He pleaded guilty in the court below to nine charges and consented to the remaining eight charges being taken into consideration for sentencing. The global sentence imposed by the District Judge was an enhanced sentence of 206 days' imprisonment, 65 months' imprisonment and disqualification from holding or obtaining all classes of driving licences for life with effect from the appellant's date of release.
The appeal against sentence focused on two of the proceeded charges, the 1st and 13th charges (DAC-925519-2020 and DAC-900125-2023), which concerned separate offences of driving a motor vehicle while disqualified under s 43(4) of the Road Traffic Act. For the 1st charge the District Judge imposed an enhanced sentence of 60 days' imprisonment, 27 months' imprisonment and disqualification for life, and for the 13th charge 30 months' imprisonment and disqualification for life, with the sentences for the two charges ordered to run consecutively. The catchwords identify the issues as a criminal appeal and the statutory offence of driving while disqualified, citing the Road Traffic Act and the Criminal Procedure Code. The respondent, the Public Prosecutor, was represented by Charlene Tay Chia and Tay Zhi Jie of the Attorney-General's Chambers.
Summary
Muhammad Nurashik bin Mohd Nasir, who had pleaded guilty in the court below to nine of 17 theft and traffic charges and received a global sentence including 65 months' imprisonment, an enhanced sentence, and disqualification from holding all classes of driving licences for life, appealed to the General Division of the High Court against sentence, focusing on two charges of driving while disqualified under section 43(4) of the Road Traffic Act. He argued that one conviction should be set aside because he rode only on a footway, that his imprisonment terms should be reduced, and that the sentences should run concurrently rather than consecutively. The court upheld the District Judge's decisions, including the consecutive running of the sentences, found the global sentence in keeping with his record, and dismissed the appeal against sentence.
What sentence was at issue in Muhammad Nurashik bin Mohd Nasir v PP [2024] SGHC 161?
The District Judge imposed a global enhanced sentence of 206 days' imprisonment, 65 months' imprisonment and disqualification from all driving licences for life from the appellant's date of release, after he pleaded guilty to nine of 17 theft and traffic charges.
Which charges did the appeal focus on in Muhammad Nurashik v PP [2024] SGHC 161?
The appeal focused on the 1st and 13th charges (DAC-925519-2020 and DAC-900125-2023) for driving while disqualified under s 43(4) of the Road Traffic Act. They drew 27 months' and 30 months' imprisonment respectively, plus disqualification for life, ordered to run consecutively.
Who decided Muhammad Nurashik bin Mohd Nasir v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 161?
Vincent Hoong J delivered this ex tempore judgment in the General Division of the High Court on 26 June 2024, in Magistrate's Appeal No 9035 of 2024. The Public Prosecutor was represented by Charlene Tay Chia and Tay Zhi Jie of the Attorney-General's Chambers.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (11)
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Sentencing outcomes for this offence
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 161)