W

Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas appears as counsel of record in 7 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the SGHC.

Reported cases
7
Courts
SGHC, SGCA
Period
January 2023 to October 2025

Source: derived from 7 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas's reported litigation record covers 7 Singapore court cases (2023–2025). The cases below set out Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas's role as counsel, the parties involved, and what each court decided.

About Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas

Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas appears as counsel of record in 7 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025). These were heard before SGHC (4) and SGCA (3).

What areas of law does Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas practice?

Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas appeared most frequently in Criminal Procedure and Sentencing (3 cases), Evidence (2 cases), and Criminal Law (2 cases) between January 2023 and October 2025, across 7 total case appearances in Singapore courts.

Criminal Procedure and Sentencing 3 cases

Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas appeared as counsel in 3 Criminal Procedure and Sentencing cases between January 2023 and October 2025.

Evidence 2 cases

Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas appeared as counsel in 2 Evidence cases between December 2024 and May 2025.

How many cases has Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas appeared in?

Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas appears as counsel of record in 7 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025).

Which courts does Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas appear in?

Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas appears before SGHC (4) and SGCA (3).

7
Appearances
3
Roles
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the respondent (4)

Counsel for the prosecution (1)

Counsel for the applicant (2)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →