W

Waverly Seong

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Waverly Seong. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Waverly Seong appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the SGHC.

Reported cases
4
Courts
SGHC, SGCA
Period
May 2023 to April 2025

Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Waverly Seong — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

Waverly Seong's reported litigation record covers 4 Singapore court cases (2023–2025). The cases below set out Waverly Seong's role as counsel, the parties involved, and what each court decided.

How Waverly Seong appeared

Counsel for the defendant
2 cases
Counsel for the respondent
1 case
Counsel for the claimant
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Appeal dismissed
1

Disposition recorded in 1 of 4 cases.

What the courts decided

[2025] SGCA 20 Appeal dismissed

“The appeal was accordingly dismissed.”

KHOO PHAIK EAN PATRICIA & Anor v KHOO PHAIK ENG KATHERINE & 2 Ors · SGCA · · Counsel for the respondent

About Waverly Seong

Waverly Seong appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025). These were heard before SGHC (3) and SGCA (1).

What areas of law does Waverly Seong practice?

Waverly Seong appeared most frequently in Trusts (2 cases), Civil Procedure (1 case), and Tort (1 case) between May 2023 and April 2025, across 4 total case appearances in Singapore courts.

How many cases has Waverly Seong appeared in?

Waverly Seong appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025).

Which courts does Waverly Seong appear in?

Waverly Seong appears before SGHC (3) and SGCA (1).

4
Appearances
2021
Year of Call
2
Firms
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the respondent (1)

Counsel for the claimant (1)

Counsel for the defendant (2)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →