V

Vikram Nair

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP · 2023–2026 Called to the Bar in 2006 11 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Vikram Nair. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Vikram Nair appears as counsel of record in 11 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the SGHC.

Reported cases
11
Courts
SGHC, SGCA(I), SGHC(I), SGCA
Period
September 2023 to May 2026

Source: derived from 11 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Vikram Nair — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

Vikram Nair's reported litigation record covers 11 Singapore court cases (2023–2026). The cases below set out Vikram Nair's role as counsel, the parties involved, and what each court decided.

About Vikram Nair

Vikram Nair appears as counsel of record in 11 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). These were heard before SGHC (8), SGCA(I) (1) and SGHC(I) (1).

What areas of law does Vikram Nair practice?

Vikram Nair appeared most frequently in Tort (3 cases), Civil Procedure (3 cases), and Evidence (2 cases) between September 2023 and May 2026, across 11 total case appearances in Singapore courts.

Tort 3 cases

Vikram Nair appeared as counsel in 3 Tort cases between October 2024 and November 2025.

Civil Procedure 3 cases

Vikram Nair appeared as counsel in 3 Civil Procedure cases between November 2023 and March 2024.

How many cases has Vikram Nair appeared in?

Vikram Nair appears as counsel of record in 11 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026).

Which courts does Vikram Nair appear in?

Vikram Nair appears before SGHC (8), SGCA(I) (1) and SGHC(I) (1).

11
Appearances
2006
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the plaintiff (1)

Counsel for the respondent (1)

Counsel for the defendant (6)

Counsel for the third party (1)

Counsel for the appellant (1)

Counsel for the claimant (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →