U

Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram

Phoenix Law Corporation · 2023–2026 Called to the Bar in 1991 5 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram appears as counsel of record in 5 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the SGHC.

Reported cases
5
Courts
SGHC, SGDC
Period
May 2023 to June 2026

Source: derived from 5 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram's reported litigation record covers 5 Singapore court cases (2023–2026). The cases below set out Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram's role as counsel, the parties involved, and what each court decided.

About Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram

Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram appears as counsel of record in 5 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). These were heard before SGHC (4) and SGDC (1).

What areas of law does Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram practice?

Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram appeared most frequently in Contract (2 cases), Criminal Law (1 case), and Legal Profession (1 case) between May 2023 and June 2026, across 5 total case appearances in Singapore courts.

Contract 2 cases

Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram appeared as counsel in 2 Contract cases between October 2023 and February 2026.

How many cases has Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram appeared in?

Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram appears as counsel of record in 5 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026).

Which courts does Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram appear in?

Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram appears before SGHC (4) and SGDC (1).

5
Appearances
1991
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the respondents (1)

Counsel for the defendant (2)

Counsel for the appellant (1)

Counsel for the applicant (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →