L

Lin Weiqi Wendy

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Lin Weiqi Wendy. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Lin Weiqi Wendy appears as counsel of record in 16 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the SGHC.

Reported cases
16
Courts
SGHC, SGHC(I), SGHC(A)
Period
February 2023 to April 2026

Source: derived from 16 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Lin Weiqi Wendy — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

Lin Weiqi Wendy's reported litigation record covers 16 Singapore court cases (2023–2026). The cases below set out Lin Weiqi Wendy's role as counsel, the parties involved, and what each court decided.

About Lin Weiqi Wendy

Lin Weiqi Wendy appears as counsel of record in 16 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). These were heard before SGHC (10), SGHC(I) (4) and SGHC(A) (2).

What areas of law does Lin Weiqi Wendy practice?

Lin Weiqi Wendy appeared most frequently in Civil Procedure (6 cases), Arbitration (5 cases), and Legal Profession (2 cases) between February 2023 and April 2026, across 16 total case appearances in Singapore courts.

Civil Procedure 6 cases

Lin Weiqi Wendy appeared as counsel in 6 Civil Procedure cases between November 2024 and April 2026.

Arbitration 5 cases

Lin Weiqi Wendy appeared as counsel in 5 Arbitration cases between April 2024 and November 2025.

How many cases has Lin Weiqi Wendy appeared in?

Lin Weiqi Wendy appears as counsel of record in 16 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026).

Which courts does Lin Weiqi Wendy appear in?

Lin Weiqi Wendy appears before SGHC (10), SGHC(I) (4) and SGHC(A) (2).

16
Appearances
6
Roles
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the respondent (2)

Counsel for the defendant (1)

Counsel for the claimant (5)

Counsel for the appellant (1)

Counsel for the applicant (4)

Counsel for the plaintiff (3)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →