L

Lim Hui Ying

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Lim Hui Ying. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Lim Hui Ying appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2026), most often before the SGDC.

Reported cases
4
Courts
SGDC, SGHC, SGCA
Period
August 2024 to January 2026

Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Lim Hui Ying — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

Lim Hui Ying's reported litigation record covers 4 Singapore court cases (2024–2026). The cases below set out Lim Hui Ying's role as counsel, the parties involved, and what each court decided.

About Lim Hui Ying

Lim Hui Ying appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2026). These were heard before SGDC (2), SGHC (1) and SGCA (1).

What areas of law does Lim Hui Ying practice?

Lim Hui Ying appeared most frequently in Damages (3 cases), Civil Procedure (1 case), and Tort (1 case) between August 2024 and January 2026, across 4 total case appearances in Singapore courts.

How many cases has Lim Hui Ying appeared in?

Lim Hui Ying appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2026).

Which courts does Lim Hui Ying appear in?

Lim Hui Ying appears before SGDC (2), SGHC (1) and SGCA (1).

4
Appearances
2
Roles
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the defendant (3)

Counsel for the appellant (1)

In the court record

The reported judgments Lim Hui Ying appears in are aggregated on the practice-area court records below, each of which sets out the counsel who appear most often in that area of the reported record.

These appearances also feed the Most Active Lawyers in Singapore, Ranked by Reported Court Cases, the site-wide court-record ranking of Singapore counsel by the number of reported judgments in which they appear.

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →