K

Kyle Chong Kee Cheng

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Kyle Chong Kee Cheng. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Kyle Chong Kee Cheng appears as counsel of record in 8 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2025), most often before the SGHC.

Reported cases
8
Courts
SGHC, SGHC(I), SGCA
Period
March 2024 to November 2025

Source: derived from 8 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Kyle Chong Kee Cheng — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

Kyle Chong Kee Cheng's reported litigation record covers 8 Singapore court cases (2024–2025). The cases below set out Kyle Chong Kee Cheng's role as counsel, the parties involved, and what each court decided.

About Kyle Chong Kee Cheng

Kyle Chong Kee Cheng appears as counsel of record in 8 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2025). These were heard before SGHC (5), SGHC(I) (2) and SGCA (1).

What areas of law does Kyle Chong Kee Cheng practice?

Kyle Chong Kee Cheng appeared most frequently in Arbitration (4 cases), Civil Procedure (2 cases), and Legal Profession (2 cases) between March 2024 and November 2025, across 8 total case appearances in Singapore courts.

Arbitration 4 cases

Kyle Chong Kee Cheng appeared as counsel in 4 Arbitration cases between March 2024 and November 2025.

Civil Procedure 2 cases

Kyle Chong Kee Cheng appeared as counsel in 2 Civil Procedure cases between March 2025 and November 2025.

How many cases has Kyle Chong Kee Cheng appeared in?

Kyle Chong Kee Cheng appears as counsel of record in 8 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2025).

Which courts does Kyle Chong Kee Cheng appear in?

Kyle Chong Kee Cheng appears before SGHC (5), SGHC(I) (2) and SGCA (1).

8
Appearances
4
Roles
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the defendant (3)

Counsel for the plaintiff (1)

Counsel for the respondent (3)

Counsel for the applicant (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →