C

Chu Shao Wei Jeremy

Shook Lin & Bok LLP · 2023–2026 Called to the Bar in 2021 5 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Chu Shao Wei Jeremy. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Chu Shao Wei Jeremy appears as counsel of record in 5 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the SGCA.

Reported cases
5
Courts
SGCA, SGHC
Period
November 2023 to May 2026

Source: derived from 5 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Chu Shao Wei Jeremy — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

Chu Shao Wei Jeremy's reported litigation record covers 5 Singapore court cases (2023–2026). The cases below set out Chu Shao Wei Jeremy's role as counsel, the parties involved, and what each court decided.

About Chu Shao Wei Jeremy

Chu Shao Wei Jeremy appears as counsel of record in 5 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). These were heard before SGCA (3) and SGHC (2).

What areas of law does Chu Shao Wei Jeremy practice?

Chu Shao Wei Jeremy appeared most frequently in Insolvency Law (3 cases), Civil Procedure (2 cases), and Arbitration (2 cases) between November 2023 and May 2026, across 5 total case appearances in Singapore courts.

Insolvency Law 3 cases

Chu Shao Wei Jeremy appeared as counsel in 3 Insolvency Law cases between November 2023 and May 2026.

Civil Procedure 2 cases

Chu Shao Wei Jeremy appeared as counsel in 2 Civil Procedure cases between July 2025 and October 2025.

How many cases has Chu Shao Wei Jeremy appeared in?

Chu Shao Wei Jeremy appears as counsel of record in 5 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026).

Which courts does Chu Shao Wei Jeremy appear in?

Chu Shao Wei Jeremy appears before SGCA (3) and SGHC (2).

5
Appearances
2021
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the respondent (3)

Counsel for the non-party (1)

Counsel for the appellant (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →