G

Gabriel Law Corporation

13 reported cases 12 counsel named

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Gabriel Law Corporation. It is not a directory listing. Names, firm names and counsel appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current lawyers and contact details, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Gabriel Law Corporation appears in 13 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the SGHC.

Gabriel Law Corporation is a Singapore law firm in the reported-judgment record, appearing as counsel in 13 reported Singapore judgments (including [2025] SGHC 263). This page is the Singapore law firm of that name.

Reported cases
13
Courts
SGHC, SGDC, SGHCF, SGHC(A), SGHCR
Period
May 2023 to December 2025

Source: derived from 13 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Gabriel Law Corporation — Reported Cases & Litigation History

Gabriel Law Corporation's reported litigation history spans 13 Singapore court cases (2023–2025). The record below sets out who the firm has acted for and against, the courts, and what each court decided.

How Gabriel Law Corporation appeared

Counsel for the defendant
4 cases
Counsel for the applicant
3 cases
Counsel for the accused
2 cases
Counsel for the third party
1 case
Counsel for the appellant
1 case
Counsel for the first defendant
1 case
Counsel for the plaintiff
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Sentence imposed
1
Application dismissed
1
Application allowed
1
Appeal dismissed
1
Convicted
1

Disposition recorded in 5 of 13 cases.

What the courts decided

[2025] SGHC 249 Sentence imposed

“I sentenced the Accused to:(a) One year’s imprisonment and one stroke of the cane for the First Charge;(b) seven years and six months’ imprisonment and three strokes of the cane for the Second Charge; and(c) 10 years and six months’ imprisonment and four strokes of the cane each for the Third Charge and Fourth Charge.”

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Lev Panfilov · SGHC · · Counsel for the defendant
[2025] SGHC 198 Application dismissed

“…the application is dismissed.”

WRP Asia Pacific Sdn Bhd v Grant Thornton Singapore Pte Ltd · SGHC · · Counsel for the applicant
[2025] SGHCF 51 Application allowed

“The application is allowed only to the extent of the backdated maintenance sum of $13,200.14 Counsel is to submit on the question of costs within 10 days.”

UXL v UXM · SGHCF · · Counsel for the applicant
[2024] SGHC(A) 29 Appeal dismissed

“…we dismissed the appeal in its entirety and awarded costs in favour of the Respondents on the indemnity basis (as mandated by the contractual arrangements) in the sum of $85,000 all-in.”

RAJESH HARICHANDRA BUDHRANI v INTL FCSTONE PTE LTD & 2 Ors · SGHC(A) · · Counsel for the appellant
[2024] SGHC 78 Convicted

“I convicted the Accused of the proceeded charge.”

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Masri Bin Hussain · SGHC · · Counsel for the accused

About Gabriel Law Corporation

Gabriel Law Corporation appears in 13 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025). These were heard before SGHC (9), SGDC (1) and SGHCF (1).

What areas of law does Gabriel Law Corporation specialize in?

Gabriel Law Corporation appeared most frequently in Contract (3 cases), Criminal Law (3 cases), and Companies (2 cases) between May 2023 and December 2025, across 13 total case appearances in Singapore courts.

Contract 3 cases

Gabriel Law Corporation appeared in 3 Contract cases between January 2024 and October 2025.

Criminal Law 3 cases

Gabriel Law Corporation appeared in 3 Criminal Law cases between June 2023 and December 2025.

How many cases has Gabriel Law Corporation been involved in?

Gabriel Law Corporation appears in 13 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025).

Which courts does Gabriel Law Corporation appear in?

Gabriel Law Corporation appears before SGHC (9), SGDC (1) and SGHCF (1).

Counsel named in these judgments (12)

Lawyers recorded as counsel from Gabriel Law Corporation in at least one reported judgment, with the years they appear. Not a current staff list.

13
Cases
12
Counsel named
13
Appearances

All reported cases (13)

Rankings

Most active law firms by reported court cases →