UXL v UXM

[2025] SGHCF 51 High Court (Family Division) 28 August 2025 • HCF/OADTV 5/2025 • 6 min read

Outcome

Application allowed

The application is allowed only to the extent of the backdated maintenance sum of $13,200.14 Counsel is to submit on the question of costs within 10 days.

Source: [2025] SGHCF 51, High Court (Family Division), decided 28 August 2025. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court	High Court (Family Division)
Decided	28 August 2025
Judge	Choo Han Teck
Charges / claim	Family Law
Outcome	Application allowed
Sentence / award	$13,200.14
Counsel	Bih Li & Lee LLP, Gabriel Law Corporation, Nandwani Manoj Prakash, Nur Halimatul Syafheqah, Petrina Tan Heng Kiat, Wang Liansheng

Source: [2025] SGHCF 51, High Court (Family Division), decided 28 August 2025 — eLitigation. Updated 25 June 2026.

Catchwords

Family Law — Child — Maintenance of Child

Practice Areas

Family Law

Judges (1)

Choo Han Teck Delivered

Counsel (6)

Bih Li & Lee LLP Firm Gabriel Law Corporation Firm Nandwani Manoj Prakash Counsel Applicant Nur Halimatul Syafheqah Counsel Applicant Petrina Tan Heng Kiat Counsel Respondent Wang Liansheng Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

UXL Applicant UXM Respondent

Case Significance

[2025] SGHCF 51 is a High Court (Family Division) decision dated 28 August 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing child. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by UXL (applicant) against UXM (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Gabriel Law Corporation and Bih Li & Lee LLP.

Summary

A mother sought to increase child maintenance from $2,000 to over $15,000 per child per month, in proceedings complicated by earlier findings of fraudulent misrepresentation by the mother in a related trust deed case. The court allowed the application only to the extent of $13,200 in backdated lump sum maintenance for additional tuition expenses, rejecting the broader claims for increased maintenance.

What was decided in [2025] SGHCF 51?

[2025] SGHCF 51 (UXL v UXM) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 28 August 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically child. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.

Who were the parties in UXL v UXM ([2025] SGHCF 51)?

The applicant in [2025] SGHCF 51 was UXL, and the respondent was UXM. Legal representation included Bih Li & Lee LLP and Gabriel Law Corporation. The case was decided on 28 August 2025 in the High Court (Family Division).