AEROSPACE SOLUTIONS ENTERPRISES PTE. LTD. v LOW ENG WAH (LIU RONGHUA)
Key facts
| Court | Magistrate Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Evans Ng |
| Charges / claim | Employment Law |
| Counsel | Cornerstone Law LLP, Tito Isaac & Co LLP, Chen Sheng Hans, Joni Loke Si En, Yeo Cai Yun Kimberly |
Source: [2026] SGMC 89, Magistrate Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
Aerospace Solutions Enterprises Pte. Ltd. v Low Eng Wah (Liu Ronghua) [2026] SGMC 89 is a decision of District Judge Evans Ng in the Magistrate's Court, dated 27 July 2026, in Originating Claim No 11601 of 2025. The defendant, a Quality, Environment, Health and Safety Manager paid $9,000 monthly, resigned on 1 April 2025 and left on 31 May 2025, although his contract required six months' notice. The claimant sought $36,000, being four months' salary in lieu of the unserved notice. The defendant argued an agreement to abridge notice, that the notice period was unreasonably long, and that no loss was suffered. The court rejected each defence, treating the claim as a debt, and ordered payment of $36,000 with interest at 5.33% per annum, costs to be heard.
[2026] SGMC 89 explained
AEROSPACE SOLUTIONS ENTERPRISES PTE. LTD. v LOW ENG WAH (LIU RONGHUA) ([2026] SGMC 89) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Magistrate Court on 27 July 2026. It is categorised under Employment Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGMC 89 about?
AEROSPACE SOLUTIONS ENTERPRISES PTE. LTD. v LOW ENG WAH (LIU RONGHUA) ([2026] SGMC 89) is a Magistrate Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Employment Law — Contract of service — Breach” and “Employment Law — Contract of service — Termination with notice”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGMC 89 consider?
The judgment refers to Employment Act (Cap 91). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
The Magistrate's Court heard a claim by Aerospace Solutions Enterprises Pte. Ltd. against Low Eng Wah, who resigned on 1 April 2025 and left on 31 May 2025 instead of serving his six-month notice period. The claimant sought $36,000, four months' salary in lieu. The court rejected his defences of an agreed abridgment, unreasonable notice length and no loss, and ordered him to pay $36,000 with interest at 5.33% per annum.
What was Aerospace Solutions Enterprises Pte. Ltd. v Low Eng Wah [2026] SGMC 89 about?
An employer sued a former manager who left after two months of a six-month notice period, claiming four months' salary in lieu. The Magistrate's Court rejected his defences and held him liable.
How much was ordered in [2026] SGMC 89?
The court ordered Mr Low to pay $36,000 to the claimant, together with interest at 5.33% per annum from the date the originating claim was filed until judgment. The court said it would hear the parties on costs.
Statutes Cited
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGMC 89)