DQR & Anor v DQT

[2026] SGHC 23 High Court (General Division) 28 January 2026 • HC/OA 450/2025 • 43 min read

3 cases cited

Key facts

Court	High Court (General Division)
Decided	28 January 2026
Judge	Vinodh Coomaraswamy
Charges / claim	Arbitration
Counsel	Drew & Napier LLC, WongPartnership LLP, Cavinder Bull, Daniel Cai, Daryl Wong, Sean Tan, Wee Min, Wendy Lin

Source: [2026] SGHC 23, High Court (General Division), decided 28 January 2026 — eLitigation. Updated 25 June 2026.

Catchwords

Arbitration - Award - Recourse against award - Setting aside

Practice Areas

Arbitration

Judges (1)

Vinodh Coomaraswamy Delivered

Counsel (8)

Drew & Napier LLC Firm WongPartnership LLP Firm Cavinder Bull Counsel Defendant Daniel Cai Counsel Defendant Daryl Wong Counsel Plaintiff Sean Tan Counsel Defendant Wee Min Counsel Plaintiff Wendy Lin Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (3)

DQR Plaintiff DQS Plaintiff DQT Defendant

Case Significance

[2026] SGHC 23 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 28 January 2026 concerning Arbitration, specifically addressing award. The judgment was delivered by Vinodh Coomaraswamy. The case was brought by DQR and others (plaintiff) against DQT (defendant). Legal representation was provided by WongPartnership LLP and Drew & Napier LLC. The judgment cites 3 cases and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Arbitration Act, the Companies Act, and the International Arbitration Act.

Summary

DQR and another party sought declarations and relief against DQT in a dispute involving trust arrangements and beneficial ownership of assets. The court addressed issues of resulting trusts, constructive trusts, and the parties' respective beneficial interests in the disputed assets.

What was decided in [2026] SGHC 23?

[2026] SGHC 23 (DQR & Anor v DQT) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 28 January 2026 addressing Arbitration, specifically award. The judgment was delivered by Vinodh Coomaraswamy.

Who were the parties in DQR & Anor v DQT ([2026] SGHC 23)?

The plaintiff in [2026] SGHC 23 was DQR, DQS, and the defendant was DQT. Legal representation included WongPartnership LLP and Drew & Napier LLC. The case was decided on 28 January 2026 in the High Court (General Division).