Zeus Matisse v ESA Security Pte. Ltd.
4 cases cited
Outcome
Judgment for the claimantjudgment is entered for the Claimant in the sum of $29,885.49 and CPF contribution amounting to $6,635.85, together with interest at 5.33% p.a. on these sums from the date of the originating claim to the date of judgment.
Source: [2026] SGDC 82, District Court, decided 9 March 2026. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | District Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Sia Aik Kor |
| Charges / claim | Employment Law, Mistake —Mistake of law |
| Outcome | Judgment for the claimant |
| Sentence / award | $29,885.49 |
Source: [2026] SGDC 82, District Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Employment Law — Holidays Employment Law — Pay — Shift workers Employment Law — Leave — Annual leave Employment Law — Benefits — Medical bills Employment Law — Rest days — Hours of work Mistake —Mistake of law — Whether CPF contributions were made under mistake of law Employment Law — Contract of service — Whether contract of service or contract for services Employment Law — Contract of service —Termination with notice — Whether termination was wrongful
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Statutes Cited
Central Provident Fund Act
Cases on this Act →
s 71(4)
CPF Act
s 71(4)
Cases Cited (4)
SG (2)
[2008] SGHC 65 [2017] SGHC 53
SLR (2)
[2002] 1 SLR(R) 418 [2019] 5 SLR 554
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGDC 82)