DKB v DKC
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (8)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC(I) 11 is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision dated 16 April 2025 concerning Arbitration, specifically addressing enforcement and stay of court proceedings. The judgment was delivered by Thomas Bathurst. The case was brought by DKB (applicant) against DKC (respondent). Legal representation was provided by A.Ang, Seah & Hoe and Allen & Gledhill LLP. The judgment cites 10 cases (6 Singapore, 4 foreign) and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Arbitration Act and the International Arbitration Act. This decision has been cited by 2 subsequent judgments in the dataset.
[2025] SGHC(I) 11 explained
DKB v DKC ([2025] SGHC(I) 11) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court on 16 April 2025. It is categorised under Arbitration. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 2 other reported Singapore judgments, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC(I) 11 about?
DKB v DKC ([2025] SGHC(I) 11) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Arbitration — Enforcement — Foreign award” and “Arbitration — Stay of court proceedings — Mandatory stay under International Arbitration Act — Settlement deed containing arbitration agreement”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC(I) 11 consider?
The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10), International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A), and International Arbitration Act (Cap 10). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
How influential is [2025] SGHC(I) 11?
Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC(I) 11 has been cited by 2 later reported Singapore judgments. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
DKB sought to enforce a US$315.9 million arbitral award against DKC in Singapore. DKC applied to stay enforcement under s 6 of the International Arbitration Act based on an arbitration clause in a Settlement Deed. The SICC granted the stay subject to conditions requiring DKC to commence a Stockholm arbitration within 10 days and diligently prosecute it, but declined to impose security.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC(I) 11?
[2025] SGHC(I) 11 (DKB v DKC) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 16 April 2025 addressing Arbitration, specifically enforcement and stay of court proceedings. The judgment was delivered by Thomas Bathurst.
Who were the parties in DKB v DKC?
The applicant in [2025] SGHC(I) 11 was DKB, and the respondent was DKC. Legal representation included Allen & Gledhill LLP and A.Ang, Seah & Hoe. The case was decided on 16 April 2025 in the Singapore International Commercial Court.
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC(I) 11?
[2025] SGHC(I) 11 was delivered by Thomas Bathurst in the Singapore International Commercial Court on 16 April 2025. The case concerned Arbitration.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC(I) 11 cite?
[2025] SGHC(I) 11 cites 10 prior decisions, including 4 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Arbitration Act, International Arbitration Act. The decision has itself been cited by 2 subsequent judgments.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (10)
Cited By (2)
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC(I) 11)