DKB v DKC
Outcome
Application dismissedThe application was dismissed with costs.
Source: [2024] SGHC(I) 31, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided 25 October 2024. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | Singapore International Commercial Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Thomas Bathurst |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Outcome | Application dismissed |
| Counsel | A.Ang, Seah & Hoe, Allen & Gledhill LLP, Ang Cheng Ann Alfonso, Chong Yee Leong, James Ch'ng Chin Leong, KarLuis Quek, Liew Pei Jun Annette, Ng Ying Ning Theodora |
Source: [2024] SGHC(I) 31, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (8)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
DKB v DKC [2024] SGHC(I) 31 was a decision of the Singapore International Commercial Court delivered by Thomas Bathurst IJ on 25 October 2024, in Originating Application No 10 of 2024 (Summons No 46 of 2024). The applicant, DKB, was the assignee of the Final Award issued on 9 October 2023 in a Swiss-seated arbitration between B and the defendant, DKC (the B Award). By an ex parte order made on 29 December 2023, DKB was granted leave to enforce the B Award under s 29 of the International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed), and in that application DKB also sought payment of the sum awarded to its assignor of US$315,913,822.32. By summons HC/SUM 1177/2024 filed on 24 April 2024, DKC sought a stay of all further proceedings under s 6 of the International Arbitration Act, and by HC/SUM 1133/2024 sought to set aside the earlier order. In support, DKC relied on a deed dated 23 March 2017 between DKB, DKC and two other parties, C and D (the Settlement Deed), under which D would transfer its shares in a company, E, to C for US$150,000,000 payable by instalments commencing on 30 June 2017 and concluding on 31 March 2027. The judgment addressed the civil-procedure question of whether a question of foreign law is to be determined by submissions or by proof.
[2024] SGHC(I) 31 explained
DKB v DKC ([2024] SGHC(I) 31) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court on 25 October 2024. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2024] SGHC(I) 31 about?
DKB v DKC ([2024] SGHC(I) 31) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Foreign law — Whether question of foreign law to be determined by submissions or proof”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2024] SGHC(I) 31 consider?
The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10), International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A), and International Arbitration Act (Cap 10). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What was DKB v DKC [2024] SGHC(I) 31 about?
DKB, assignee of a US$315,913,822.32 Swiss-seated arbitration award (the B Award), had obtained leave under section 29 of the International Arbitration Act to enforce it. DKC applied to stay proceedings under section 6 and to set aside that order, relying on a 2017 Settlement Deed.
What procedural question did DKB v DKC [2024] SGHC(I) 31 raise?
Per its catchwords, the Singapore International Commercial Court case, decided by Thomas Bathurst IJ on 25 October 2024, raised the civil-procedure question of whether a question of foreign law is to be determined by submissions or by proof.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (5)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC(I) 31)