OON SWEE GEK & 2 Ors v VIOLET OON INC. PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors

[2024] SGHC 170 High Court (General Division) 3 July 2024 HC/OC 301/2022 · HC/CWU 195/2022 23 min read
8 cases cited (6 SG, 2 foreign)

Key facts

Court High Court (General Division)
Decided
Judge Philip Jeyaretnam
Charges / claim Companies, Civil Procedure
Counsel Drew & Napier LLC, TSMP Law Corporation, Chew Xizhi Stephanie, Fu Wei Jun Nicholas, Jacinth Teo Ying En, Justin Lai Wen-Jin, Meryl Koh Junning, Phoon Wuei, Shahera Safrin, Thio Shen Yi

Source: [2024] SGHC 170, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (10)

Parties (6)

Case Significance

Oon Swee Gek and others v Violet Oon Inc Pte Ltd and others and another matter [2024] SGHC 170 was a reserved judgment of the General Division of the High Court of Singapore, delivered by Philip Jeyaretnam J on 3 July 2024 following a hearing on 23 May 2024. It comprised Originating Claim No 301 of 2022 and Companies Winding Up No 195 of 2022 (the latter brought under ss 125(1)(f) and 125(1)(i) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018), and was a supplementary judgment to the court's earlier decision of 19 January 2024, Oon Swee Gek and others v Violet Oon Inc Pte Ltd and others [2024] SGHC 13 ("Violet Oon (Merits)").

In Violet Oon (Merits), the court had held that the second defendant, Murjani Manoj Mohan, had in 2019 procured a shareholders' agreement with the claimants — Oon Swee Gek, Tay Su-Lyn and Tay Yiming — through duress and undue influence, and set it aside, finding that his conduct amounted to commercial unfairness engaging s 216(1) of the Companies Act 1967. As reflected in the catchwords, this supplementary judgment dealt with the oppression remedy of ordering a sale of shares by a member to other members, including independent valuation of those shares for compulsory sale, and with the quantum of party-and-party costs under Appendix G of the Supreme Court Practice Directions 2021. The claimants were represented by Drew & Napier LLC and the defendants by TSMP Law Corporation, including Thio Shen Yi.

[2024] SGHC 170 explained

OON SWEE GEK & 2 Ors v VIOLET OON INC. PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors ([2024] SGHC 170) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 3 July 2024. It is categorised under Companies and Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGHC 170 about?

OON SWEE GEK & 2 Ors v VIOLET OON INC. PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors ([2024] SGHC 170) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Companies — Oppression — Remedies — Order requiring sale of shares in company by member to other members — Independent valuation of shares in company for compulsory sale” and “Civil Procedure — Costs — Quantum — Appendix G of Supreme Court Practice Directions 2021 — Costs guidelines for party-and-party costs for trials of commercial matters”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 170 consider?

The judgment refers to Companies Act (Cap 50), Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act, and Restructuring and Dissolution Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2024] SGHC 170 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHC 13. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.

Summary

This was a supplementary judgment by Philip Jeyaretnam J following an earlier merits decision in which the second defendant was found to have engaged in commercially unfair conduct under s 216 of the Companies Act 1967, with the ordered remedy being the compulsory sale of his shareholding in Violet Oon Inc Pte Ltd (held via the third defendant) to the claimants, who are family members owning half the company. The outstanding matters concerned terms of the independent valuation for the court-ordered share sale and the incidence and quantum of costs. The court decided the disputed valuation terms and awarded the claimants $299,000 in costs plus disbursements of $63,889.95, for which the second and third defendants were jointly and severally liable.

What did the court address in Oon Swee Gek v Violet Oon Inc Pte Ltd [2024] SGHC 170?

[2024] SGHC 170 was a supplementary judgment by Philip Jeyaretnam J addressing the oppression remedy of a compulsory share sale with independent valuation, and the quantum of party-and-party costs under Appendix G of the Supreme Court Practice Directions 2021, following the earlier Violet Oon (Merits) decision.

What had been decided in the earlier Violet Oon merits judgment referenced in [2024] SGHC 170?

In the earlier [2024] SGHC 13, the court found that second defendant Murjani Manoj Mohan procured a 2019 shareholders' agreement through duress and undue influence and set it aside, holding his conduct amounted to commercial unfairness engaging s 216(1) of the Companies Act 1967.

Statutes Cited

Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act Cases on this Act →
Restructuring and Dissolution Act Cases on this Act →

Cases Cited (8)

SLR (5)
[1994] 2 SLR(R) 501 [2011] 1 SLR 582 [2011] 2 SLR 343 [2020] 1 SLR 275 [2021] 1 SLR 497
UK (2)
[1984] 1 Ch 419 [2004] EWCA Civ 576

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 170)