PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Muhammad Salihin Bin Ismail

[2024] SGCA 22 Court of Appeal 1 July 2024 CA/CCA 5/2022 · CA/CCA 19/2022 · CA/CCA 23/2022 34 min read
6 cases cited Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court Court of Appeal
Decided
Judges Debbie Ong Siew Ling, Sundaresh Menon, Tay Yong Kwang
Charges / claim Criminal Law
Counsel Attorney-General's Chambers, Eugene Thuraisingam LLP, Eugene Thuraisingam, Lim Yu Hui, Senthilkumaran Sabapathy, Sophia Clare Ng, Suang Wijaya

Source: [2024] SGCA 22, Court of Appeal, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (3)

Counsel (7)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Salihin bin Ismail [2024] SGCA 22 was a grounds of decision of the Court of Appeal of Singapore, delivered by Tay Yong Kwang JCA on 1 July 2024 on behalf of a coram comprising Sundaresh Menon CJ, Tay Yong Kwang JCA and Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD, following a hearing on 2 April 2024. It disposed of Criminal Appeals Nos 5, 19 and 23 of 2022, arising from Criminal Case No 6 of 2021. Muhammad Salihin bin Ismail ("Salihin") was the stepfather of the deceased, Nursabrina Agustiani Abdullah (the "Victim"), and had claimed trial to a charge of murder under s 300(c) punishable under s 302(2) of the Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed).

The charge arose from two incidents between about 9.00 a.m. on 1 September 2018 and about 9.40 a.m. on 2 September 2018 at Block 447A, Bukit Batok West Avenue 9, in which Salihin was alleged to have punched and kicked the Victim in her abdomen, causing intra-abdominal bleeding that resulted in her death on 2 September 2018. As reflected in the catchwords, the matter concerned the offence of murder. The Prosecution was represented by the Attorney-General's Chambers, including Lim Yu Hui and Senthilkumaran Sabapathy, while Salihin was represented by Eugene Thuraisingam LLP, including Eugene Thuraisingam and Suang Wijaya.

[2024] SGCA 22 explained

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Muhammad Salihin Bin Ismail ([2024] SGCA 22) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Court of Appeal on 1 July 2024. It is categorised under Criminal Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGCA 22 about?

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Muhammad Salihin Bin Ismail ([2024] SGCA 22) is a Court of Appeal decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Criminal Law — Offences — Murder”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2024] SGCA 22 consider?

The judgment refers to Children and Young Persons Act (Cap 38), Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68), and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

How influential is [2024] SGCA 22?

Within this corpus, [2024] SGCA 22 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

What was the charge in Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Salihin bin Ismail [2024] SGCA 22?

In [2024] SGCA 22, Muhammad Salihin bin Ismail, stepfather of the deceased Nursabrina Agustiani Abdullah, claimed trial to murder under s 300(c) punishable under s 302(2) of the Penal Code, for causing intra-abdominal bleeding that resulted in the Victim's death on 2 September 2018.

Which court decided PP v Muhammad Salihin bin Ismail [2024] SGCA 22 and when?

[2024] SGCA 22 was decided by the Court of Appeal of Singapore on 1 July 2024, with Tay Yong Kwang JCA delivering the grounds of decision alongside Sundaresh Menon CJ and Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD, disposing of Criminal Appeals Nos 5, 19 and 23 of 2022.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (6)

SG (2)
[2020] SGHC 168 [2023] SGHC 155
SLR (4)
[2005] 4 SLR(R) 582 [2012] 4 SLR 590 [2018] 1 SLR 127 [2022] 2 SLR 825

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGCA 22)