Protection from Harassment Act Cap 256A

7 judgments · 3 courts · 3 cited sections

The Protection from Harassment Act (Cap 256A) has been cited, interpreted or applied in 7 Singapore judgments in this corpus, spanning 3 distinct sections. The decisions below are the primary source for how the courts have read it. This page reports those decisions; it is not legal advice.

Which sections of the Protection from Harassment Act have the courts cited?

Sections of Cap 256A referenced across the 7 judgments below.

s 6(3) s 7(1) s 7(2)

Which cases interpret the Protection from Harassment Act?

Andrew Cheah Kim Wee & Anor v Low Xiang Ping Jane

12 March 2026

SGDC

[2026] SGDC 33

HVS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED v VINOD EASHWAR

21 January 2026

SGDC

[2025] SGHC 260

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Gao Xiong

23 December 2025

SGHC

[2025] SGHC 173

Martin Piper v Singapore Kindness Movement

29 August 2025

SGHC

[2025] SGHC 158

SENG YONG YI, LUCAS v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

8 August 2025

SGHC

[2024] SGHC 4

MICHAEL MARCUS LIEW v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

11 January 2024

SGHC

Read the statute

The authoritative, consolidated text of the Protection from Harassment Act is published by the Singapore government on Singapore Statutes Online. We link to the primary source rather than reproduce it.

Protection from Harassment Act (Cap 256A) on Singapore Statutes Online ↗

Compiled by the SG Case Law editorial team from primary sources — the judgments themselves and Singapore Statutes Online (sso.agc.gov.sg). · Updated 24 June 2026 · How we compile this