Lorenzo Wang Lianzhong
Lorenzo Wang Lianzhong appears in 1 reported Singapore court case (2025), most often before the SGHC.
- Reported cases
- 1
- Courts
- SGHC
- Period
- July 2025 to July 2025
Source: derived from 1 published Singapore judgment, most recent decision .
Lorenzo Wang Lianzhong in the reported-judgment record
In Lorenzo Wang Lianzhong's reported cases, it appeared as defendant in 1 case. These cases were heard most often in the SGHC between 2025 and 2025. Among the 1 case with a recorded disposition, the court's outcomes include Appeal dismissed (1).
How Lorenzo Wang Lianzhong appeared
- Defendant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal dismissed
- 1
Disposition recorded in 1 of 1 cases.
What the courts decided
I dismissed the appeal and ordered the claimants to pay costs to the second defendant fixed at $5,000 (inclusive of disbursements).
Reported case
I dismissed the appeal and ordered the claimants to pay costs to the second defendant fixed at $5,000 (inclusive of disbursements).
Source: [2025] SGHC 138, SGHC. Read directly from the judgment.
See the full case for the judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.
About Lorenzo Wang Lianzhong
Lorenzo Wang Lianzhong appeared as a party in 1 case before Singapore courts in July 2025. Lorenzo Wang Lianzhong appeared as defendant in the case, heard in the High Court (General Division) (1). The case involved Civil Procedure. Court records identify Lorenzo Wang Lianzhong as related to Hertel Singapore Pte Ltd (n.k.a. Altrad Services Singapore Pte Ltd) and related to Hertel Singapore Pte Ltd (n.k.a. Altrad Services Singapore Pte Ltd).
Who is Lorenzo Wang Lianzhong in Singapore court records?
Lorenzo Wang Lianzhong is an individual that appeared in 1 case before Singapore courts in July 2025. Lorenzo Wang Lianzhong most frequently appeared as defendant (1 case). Cases were heard in the High Court (General Division) (1).
What legal proceedings involved Lorenzo Wang Lianzhong?
Lorenzo Wang Lianzhong appeared in 1 case in July 2025, involving Civil Procedure. The case was heard in the High Court (General Division).