L

Lee & Lee

21 reported cases 32 counsel named

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Lee & Lee. It is not a directory listing. Names, firm names and counsel appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current lawyers and contact details, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Lee & Lee appears in 21 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the SGHC.

Reported cases
21
Courts
SGHC, SGHCF, SGHC(A)
Period
February 2023 to September 2025

Source: derived from 21 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Lee & Lee — Reported Cases & Litigation History

Lee & Lee's reported litigation history spans 21 Singapore court cases (2023–2025). The record below sets out who the firm has acted for and against, the courts, and what each court decided.

How Lee & Lee appeared

Counsel for the defendant
8 cases
Counsel for the respondent
5 cases
Counsel for the appellant
3 cases
Counsel for the plaintiff
2 cases
Counsel for the third party
1 case
Counsel for the applicant
1 case
Counsel for the first defendant
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Appeal allowed
3
Application dismissed
2
Application refused
1
Application granted
1
Appeal dismissed
1

Disposition recorded in 8 of 21 cases.

What the courts decided

[2025] SGHC 35 Application dismissed

“…the applications were dismissed.”

PRIMEPULSE CONSULTANCY PTE. LTD. v CHAN PAU TEE & Anor · SGHC · · Counsel for the respondent
[2025] SGHC 30 Application refused

“I refused the application to stay OC 294 and ordered instead that OC 294 was to be heard together with OC 276.(d) Koh was to pay the costs of the third party action in OC 276 to Goh, fixed at $30,000 plus disbursements to be fixed by me if not agreed.”

SME RESOURCES PTE LTD v KOH XIANKAI (GAO XIANKAI) · SGHC · · Counsel for the defendant
[2024] SGHC 323 Application granted

“I grant the application for the accused persons to be jointly tried on their respective charges.”

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v SENTEK MARINE & TRADING PTE LTD & 3 Ors · SGHC · · Counsel for the respondent
[2024] SGHC 66 Appeal allowed

“I therefore allowed the appeal and substituted the sentence of RT with an imprisonment term of seven days.”

FAHD SIDDIQUI v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR · SGHC · · Counsel for the appellant
[2023] SGHC 284 Application dismissed

“I dismissed the application.”

The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No. 1788 v Lau Hui Lay William & Anor · SGHC · · Counsel for the defendant
[2023] SGHC 279 Appeal dismissed

“The appeal is dismissed in whole, and the DJ’s decision is affirmed.”

PURE GROUP (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD v SIONG ANN ENGINEERING PTE LTD · SGHC · · Counsel for the respondent

About Lee & Lee

Lee & Lee appears in 21 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025). These were heard before SGHC (18), SGHCF (2) and SGHC(A) (1).

What areas of law does Lee & Lee specialize in?

Lee & Lee appeared most frequently in Contract (5 cases), Civil Procedure (3 cases), and Land (3 cases) between February 2023 and September 2025, across 21 total case appearances in Singapore courts.

Contract 5 cases

Lee & Lee appeared in 5 Contract cases between August 2023 and August 2024.

Civil Procedure 3 cases

Lee & Lee appeared in 3 Civil Procedure cases between June 2023 and September 2025.

Land 3 cases

Lee & Lee appeared in 3 Land cases between October 2023 and February 2025.

How many cases has Lee & Lee been involved in?

Lee & Lee appears in 21 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025).

Which courts does Lee & Lee appear in?

Lee & Lee appears before SGHC (18), SGHCF (2) and SGHC(A) (1).

Counsel named in these judgments (32)

Lawyers recorded as counsel from Lee & Lee in at least one reported judgment, with the years they appear. Not a current staff list.

21
Cases
32
Counsel named
21
Appearances

All reported cases (21)

[2025] SGHC 184 SGHC
MBF NORTHERN SECURITIES SDN. BHD. (IN LIQUIDATION) v PURWADI
13 September 2025
[2025] SGHC 35 SGHC
PRIMEPULSE CONSULTANCY PTE. LTD. v CHAN PAU TEE & Anor
28 February 2025
[2025] SGHC 30 SGHC
SME RESOURCES PTE LTD v KOH XIANKAI (GAO XIANKAI)
24 February 2025
[2025] SGHC 9 SGHC
Tom Smith K.C.
16 January 2025
[2024] SGHC 323 SGHC
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v SENTEK MARINE & TRADING PTE LTD & 3 Ors
16 December 2024
[2024] SGHC 213 SGHC
SENTEK MARINE & TRADING PTE LTD v MARITIME AND PORT AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE
27 August 2024
[2024] SGHC 200 SGHC
GEORGIOS BAIZANIS v SNAP INNOVATIONS PTE. LTD. & Anor
2 August 2024
[2024] SGHC 121 SGHC
CENTER FOR COMPETENCY-BASED LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. v SKILLSFUTURE SINGAPORE AGENCY
8 May 2024
[2024] SGHC 66 SGHC
FAHD SIDDIQUI v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
13 March 2024
[2024] SGHC 39 SGHC
TIGER PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT LTD v ENCORE FILMS PTE LTD
9 February 2024
[2023] SGHC 361 SGHC
MARTEN JOSEPH MATTHEW & Anor v AIQ PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) & 6 Ors
29 December 2023
[2023] SGHC 355 SGHC
SOO HOO KHOON PENG v MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO. 2906
19 December 2023
[2023] SGHCF 46 SGHCF
VUG v VUF
1 November 2023
[2023] SGHC 284 SGHC
The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No. 1788 v Lau Hui Lay William & Anor
9 October 2023
[2023] SGHC 279 SGHC
PURE GROUP (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD v SIONG ANN ENGINEERING PTE LTD
4 October 2023
[2023] SGHC 255 SGHC
TIGER PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT LTD v ENCORE FILMS PTE LTD
11 September 2023
[2023] SGHC 211 SGHC
ELCARIM SCIENCE PTE. LTD. v ZHANG YONGTAI
15 August 2023
[2023] SGHC 172 SGHC
LIAN CHEE KEK BUDDHIST TEMPLE v ONG AI MOI & 2 Ors
19 June 2023
[2023] SGHC(A) 18 SGHC(A)
ALLIANZ CAPITAL PARTNERS GMBH, SINGAPORE BRANCH v ANDRESS GOH
8 May 2023
[2023] SGHCF 14 SGHCF
WLE v WLF
22 March 2023
[2023] SGHC 35 SGHC
NICHOLAS TAN SIEW CHYE v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
17 February 2023

In the court record

The reported judgments Lee & Lee appears in are aggregated on the practice-area court records below, each of which sets out the firms that appear most often in that area of the reported record.

These appearances also feed the Largest Law Firms in Singapore, Ranked by Reported Court Cases, the site-wide court-record ranking of Singapore firms by the number of reported judgments in which they appear.

Rankings

Most active law firms by reported court cases →