Singapore Court Judgments — Week of 24–30 August 2026
In the week of 24–30 August 2026 (24 August 2026–30 August 2026), 28 judgments were reported across the Singapore courts. This weekly digest lists the notable decisions and their verbatim dispositions, free to read.
Last updated
Week of 24–30 August 2026
28 reported judgmentsIn the week of 24–30 August 2026, 28 judgments were reported across the Singapore courts (6 from the District Court, 5 from the Family Court, 5 from the High Court (General Division), and 7 more courts). Of the notable judgments listed below, 2 recorded a parseable disposition drawn verbatim from the judgment. Notable judgments are ordered by court seniority and citation frequency.
Notable judgments this week
| Citation | Court | Judgment | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|
| [2026] SGCA 38 | SGCA | Mohammad Shaffy Bin Hassan v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Criminal Law | — |
| [2026] SGHC(A) 21 | SGHC(A) | UNITED OVERSEAS BANK LIMITED v LIPPO MARINA COLLECTION PTE. LTD. Damages · Civil Procedure | Appeal allowed |
| [2026] SGHC(A) 22 | SGHC(A) | Shipworks Engineering Pte Ltd and another v Sembcorp Marine Integrated Yard Pte Ltd and another and another appeal Contract · Civil Procedure | — |
| [2026] SGHC(I) 15 | SGHC(I) | The Tata Power Company Limited v Kleros Capital Partners Limited Arbitration | — |
| [2026] SGHC(I) 16 | SGHC(I) | PT SRI REJEKI ISMAN TBK & 7 Ors Insolvency Law | — |
| [2026] SGHC(I) 14 | SGHC(I) | DVA & Anor v DVC Civil Procedure | — |
| [2026] SGHC 175 | SGHC | Reformd Pte Ltd v Kopigi Pte Ltd Contract | — |
| [2026] SGHC 171 | SGHC | NANYANG LAW LLC v GHUI MENG YANG Employment law | Appeal dismissed |
Dispositions, in the court's words
“We therefore allow the appeal against the Judge’s decision on this issue and hold that the rents and repayments received by UOB should not be deducted.”
“I dismiss the appeal and order that the Decision is to stand, and payment of $2,887.14, being the sum of $2,857.14 and disbursements incurred by Mr Ghui of $30, is to be made within one week from the date of this judgment.”
Dispositions are quoted verbatim from the judgment text. They summarise the order made and are not legal advice.
Counsel and law firms this week
12 law firms and 12 counsel appeared in this week's reported judgments, counted by number of judgments and excluding the Attorney-General's Chambers.
Derived from 28 reported judgments with decision_date in 2026-08-24–2026-08-30 in the Singapore case-law corpus. Dispositions are verbatim from judgment_text (via case_outcome); counsel/firm lists are from case_entities, prosecutor-filtered (Attorney-General's Chambers excluded). Digest compiled . Notable judgments are selected by court seniority, citation frequency and disposition parseability.