YIJ v YIK
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Family Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Dedar Singh Gill |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Counsel | Harjeet Singh & Co, I.R.B. Law LLP, Gurmeet Kaur d/o Amar Singh, Kulvinder Kaur, Marina Mohamad Sani |
Source: [2026] SGHCF 29, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
YIJ v YIK [2026] SGHCF 29 was decided by Dedar Singh Gill J in the General Division of the High Court (Family Division) on 16 September 2026. The parties married on 2 January 1960 and interim judgment was granted on 4 September 2024, after more than 64 years of marriage. The issues were the division of matrimonial assets, the Husband's claim for spousal maintenance as an incapacitated former husband, and costs. The court fixed the matrimonial pool at S$5,894,925.97, including the Matrimonial Home valued at S$5,800,000, and applied the structured approach to this dual-income marriage. It ordered the home sold, an overall 60:40 division in the Wife's favour, no maintenance for the Husband, and that each party bear their own costs.
[2026] SGHCF 29 explained
YIJ v YIK ([2026] SGHCF 29) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (Family Division) on 16 September 2026. It is categorised under Family Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHCF 29 about?
YIJ v YIK ([2026] SGHCF 29) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Family Law — Matrimonial assets — Division” and “Family Law — Maintenance — Incapacitated former husband”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGHCF 29 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2023] SGHC(A) 28. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Summary
The General Division of the High Court (Family Division) decided the ancillary matters in the divorce of a couple married on 2 January 1960, aged 90 (Husband) and 89 (Wife). The court identified a matrimonial pool of S$5,894,925.97, assessed direct contributions at 50:50 and indirect contributions at 70:30 in the Wife's favour, and ordered the Matrimonial Home sold with an overall 60:40 division in the Wife's favour. It declined the Husband's claim for spousal maintenance and ordered each party to bear their own costs.
What was YIJ v YIK [2026] SGHCF 29 about?
It concerned ancillary matters after the divorce of a couple married for more than 64 years: division of a matrimonial pool of S$5,894,925.97, the Husband's maintenance claim, property tax and costs, decided by Dedar Singh Gill J on 16 September 2026.
How were matrimonial assets divided in [2026] SGHCF 29?
Direct contributions were assessed at 50:50 and indirect contributions at 70:30 in the Wife's favour. The court ordered the Matrimonial Home sold and the net proceeds divided to effect an overall 60:40 division of the pool in the Wife's favour.
Cases Cited (11)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHCF 29)