PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Khalid Bin K K Mohamad
Outcome
Convictedthe accused was convicted on both charges.
Source: [2026] SGHC 38, High Court (General Division), decided 23 February 2026. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Aidan Xu |
| Charges / claim | Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing |
| Outcome | Convicted |
| Counsel | Attorney-General's Chambers, Eugene Thuraisingam LLP, Chan Yi Cheng, Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam, Gabriel Lee Heng Bin, Hamza Zafar Malik, Lim Li Ting |
Source: [2026] SGHC 38, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Case Significance
[2026] SGHC 38 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 23 February 2026 concerning Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, specifically addressing statutory offences and statements. The judgment was delivered by Aidan Xu. The case was brought by Public Prosecutor (applicant) against Khalid bin K K Mohamad (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Attorney-General's Chambers and Eugene Thuraisingam LLP. The judgment cites 9 cases (8 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Criminal Procedure Code and the Misuse of Drugs Act.
Summary
The Prosecution proceeded against Khalid Bin K K Mohamad for criminal offences. The High Court addressed the sentencing of the accused, considering the aggravating and mitigating factors and the applicable sentencing framework.
What was decided in [2026] SGHC 38?
[2026] SGHC 38 (PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Khalid Bin K K Mohamad) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 23 February 2026 addressing Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, specifically statutory offences and statements. The judgment was delivered by Aidan Xu.
Who were the parties in PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Khalid Bin K K Mohamad ([2026] SGHC 38)?
The applicant in [2026] SGHC 38 was Public Prosecutor, and the respondent was Khalid bin K K Mohamad. Legal representation included Eugene Thuraisingam LLP and Attorney-General's Chambers. The case was decided on 23 February 2026 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2026] SGHC 38?
[2026] SGHC 38 was delivered by Aidan Xu in the High Court (General Division) on 23 February 2026. The case concerned Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing.
What cases and statutes does [2026] SGHC 38 cite?
[2026] SGHC 38 cites 9 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Criminal Procedure Code, Misuse of Drugs Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (9)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 38)