Xu Xiangrong & Anor v Fu Xianwei & 9 Ors

[2026] SGHC(I) 23 Singapore International Commercial Court 12 October 2026 SIC/OA 17/2025 ( SIC/SUM 44/2026 ) 31 min read
7 cases cited

Key facts

Court Singapore International Commercial Court
Decided
Judges Aidan Xu, Arjan Kumar Sikri, Zhang Yongjian
Charges / claim Civil Procedure
Counsel Fullerton Law Chambers LLC, Helmsman LLC, Ang Mei Jun Sophie, Cheng Le En Leanne, Cui Shenzhi, Eng Zixuan Edmund, Huang Peide, Khng Una, Wong Weitao

Source: [2026] SGHC(I) 23, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (3)

Counsel (9)

Parties (12)

Case Significance

Xu Xiangrong and another v Fu Xianwei and others [2026] SGHC(I) 23 was decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court, with Aidan Xu J delivering the judgment of the court, together with Arjan Kumar Sikri IJ and Zhang Yongjian IJ, on 12 October 2026. In SIC/SUM 44/2026, the claimants sought an anti-suit injunction against Fu Xianwei to restrain him from continuing three actions commenced in Shanghai and any other proceedings concerning the matters to be determined in SIC/OA 17/2025. The underlying dispute arose from a 2014 joint venture agreement, a 2016 supplemental agreement and a vessel investment scheme. The court considered the jurisdiction clause, juridical advantage, comity and delay, found strong reasons in view of abusive conduct and the risk of duplicative proceedings, and granted the injunction.

[2026] SGHC(I) 23 explained

Xu Xiangrong & Anor v Fu Xianwei & 9 Ors ([2026] SGHC(I) 23) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court on 12 October 2026. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2026] SGHC(I) 23 about?

Xu Xiangrong & Anor v Fu Xianwei & 9 Ors ([2026] SGHC(I) 23) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Injunctions — Anti-suit injunction”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2026] SGHC(I) 23 consider?

The judgment refers to Civil Law Act (Cap 43). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGHC(I) 23 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC 95. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.

Summary

The Singapore International Commercial Court heard an application by Xu Xiangrong and Shanghai Changzhou International Freight Transport Agency Co, Ltd for an anti-suit injunction restraining Fu Xianwei from continuing three actions he had commenced in Shanghai, arising from a 2014 joint venture agreement and vessel investment arrangements. The court found strong reasons for the injunction, including abusive conduct, the risk of duplicative proceedings and inconsistent findings, and no loss of juridical advantage, comity or delay concerns, and granted the injunction in the terms sought.

What was Xu Xiangrong v Fu Xianwei [2026] SGHC(I) 23 about?

It was an application in the Singapore International Commercial Court for an anti-suit injunction restraining Fu Xianwei from continuing three Shanghai actions connected with a 2014 joint venture agreement and vessel investment arrangements that were also before the court in SIC/OA 17/2025.

Did the court grant the anti-suit injunction in [2026] SGHC(I) 23?

Yes. The court granted the anti-suit injunction in the terms sought by the claimants, finding strong reasons including abusive conduct and the risk of duplicative proceedings, and no issue of juridical advantage, comity or delay.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (7)

SLR (6)
[2009] 4 SLR(R) 428 [2015] 5 SLR 873 [2018] 2 SLR 1271 [2019] 1 SLR 732 [2019] 2 SLR 372 [2023] 1 SLR 1

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC(I) 23)