XZU v XZV

[2026] SGFC 31 Family Court 11 March 2026 • SSP 2336/2025 • 16 min read

5 cases cited Cited by 4 cases

Outcome

Application dismissed

I therefore dismissed the application.

Source: [2026] SGFC 31, Family Court, decided 11 March 2026. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court	Family Court
Decided	11 March 2026
Judge	Goh Kiat Yi
Charges / claim	Family Law
Outcome	Application dismissed
Counsel	A.W. Law LLC, Muhammad Hasif

Source: [2026] SGFC 31, Family Court, decided 11 March 2026 — eLitigation. Updated 23 March 2026.

Catchwords

Family Law — Personal Protection Order

Practice Areas

Family Law

Judges (1)

Goh Kiat Yi Delivered

Counsel (2)

A.W. Law LLC Firm Muhammad Hasif Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

XZU Applicant XZV Respondent

[2026] SGFC 31 explained

XZU v XZV ([2026] SGFC 31) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Family Court on 11 March 2026. It is categorised under Family Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 4 other reported Singapore judgments, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2026] SGFC 31 about?

XZU v XZV ([2026] SGFC 31) is a Family Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Family Law — Personal Protection Order”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGFC 31 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGFC 135. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.

How influential is [2026] SGFC 31?

Within this corpus, [2026] SGFC 31 has been cited by 4 later reported Singapore judgments. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.