XLK v XLJ
Outcome
Appeal dismissedThe appeal is therefore dismissed with costs.
Source: [2025] SGHCF 50, High Court (Family Division), decided 28 August 2025. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Family Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Choo Han Teck |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Outcome | Appeal dismissed |
| Counsel | Advox Law LLC, Fervent Chambers LLC, Clarence Lun Yaodong, Cornelius Sng Jia Chong |
Source: [2025] SGHCF 50, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHCF 50 is a High Court (Family Division) decision dated 28 August 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing child. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by XLK (appellant) against XLJ (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Fervent Chambers LLC and Advox Law LLC. The judgment references 1 statutory provision, namely the Guardianship of Infants Act. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.
Summary
An appeal in a cross-border custody dispute where a father abducted his son from China to Singapore in defiance of Chinese court orders granting custody to the mother. The court dismissed the appeal, finding this was outright child abduction, and upheld the order returning the child to the mother, with costs of $8,500 awarded against the father.
What was decided in [2025] SGHCF 50?
[2025] SGHCF 50 (XLK v XLJ) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 28 August 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically child. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.
Who were the parties in XLK v XLJ ([2025] SGHCF 50)?
The appellant in [2025] SGHCF 50 was XLK, and the respondent was XLJ. Legal representation included Advox Law LLC and Fervent Chambers LLC. The case was decided on 28 August 2025 in the High Court (Family Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHCF 50?
[2025] SGHCF 50 was delivered by Choo Han Teck in the High Court (Family Division) on 28 August 2025. The case concerned Family Law.
Statutes Cited
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHCF 50)