XJO v XJP

[2025] SGHCF 39 High Court (Family Division) 26 June 2025 • HCF/DCA 20/2025 ( HCF/SUM 145/2025 ) • 18 min read

7 cases cited

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

the appeal is dismissed in its entirety.

Source: [2025] SGHCF 39, High Court (Family Division), decided 26 June 2025. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court	High Court (Family Division)
Decided	26 June 2025
Judge	Choo Han Teck
Charges / claim	Family Law
Outcome	Appeal dismissed
Counsel	Kalco Law LLC, Legal Matrix LLC, Chitra Balakrishnan, Desiree Ang Li Jun, Lim Yan Yao Bill

Source: [2025] SGHCF 39, High Court (Family Division), decided 26 June 2025 — eLitigation. Updated 25 June 2026.

Catchwords

Family Law — Matrimonial assets — Division

Practice Areas

Family Law

Judges (1)

Choo Han Teck Delivered

Counsel (5)

Kalco Law LLC Firm Legal Matrix LLC Firm Chitra Balakrishnan Counsel Appellant Desiree Ang Li Jun Counsel Respondent Lim Yan Yao Bill Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

XJO Appellant XJP Respondent

Case Significance

[2025] SGHCF 39 is a High Court (Family Division) decision dated 26 June 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing matrimonial assets. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by XJO (appellant) against XJP (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Legal Matrix LLC and Kalco Law LLC. The judgment cites 7 cases.

Summary

A husband appealed against the District Judge's decision on the division of matrimonial assets, disputing direct contributions to the matrimonial home, the valuation of company shares, and indirect contributions. The court dismissed the appeal in its entirety, finding the DJ's findings on direct and indirect contributions were reasonable and should not be disturbed.

What was decided in [2025] SGHCF 39?

[2025] SGHCF 39 (XJO v XJP) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 26 June 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically matrimonial assets. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.

Who were the parties in XJO v XJP ([2025] SGHCF 39)?

The appellant in [2025] SGHCF 39 was XJO, and the respondent was XJP. Legal representation included Kalco Law LLC and Legal Matrix LLC. The case was decided on 26 June 2025 in the High Court (Family Division).