VBL v VBM

[2025] SGHCF 36 High Court (Family Division) 5 June 2025 • HCF/DCA 91/2024 • 15 min read

8 cases cited

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

the appeal is dismissed.

Source: [2025] SGHCF 36, High Court (Family Division), decided 5 June 2025. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court	High Court (Family Division)
Decided	5 June 2025
Judge	Choo Han Teck
Charges / claim	Family Law
Outcome	Appeal dismissed
Counsel	Raymond Yeo, Sterling Law Corporation, Koh Zhen Yang, Tan Siew Kim, Yeo Chee Chye Raymond

Source: [2025] SGHCF 36, High Court (Family Division), decided 5 June 2025 — eLitigation. Updated 25 June 2026.

Catchwords

Family Law — Maintenance — Child Family Law — Consent orders — Variation Family Law — Matrimonial assets — Division

Practice Areas

Family Law

Judges (1)

Choo Han Teck Delivered

Counsel (5)

Raymond Yeo Firm Sterling Law Corporation Firm Koh Zhen Yang Counsel Appellant Tan Siew Kim Counsel Appellant Yeo Chee Chye Raymond Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

VBL Appellant VBM Respondent

Case Significance

[2025] SGHCF 36 is a High Court (Family Division) decision dated 5 June 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing maintenance, consent orders, and matrimonial assets. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by VBL (appellant) against VBM (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Sterling Law Corporation and Raymond Yeo. The judgment cites 8 cases.

Summary

An appeal by a wife against the District Judge's decision on the interpretation of a consent order regarding children's tertiary education expenses and alleged concealment of assets during settlement negotiations. The court dismissed the appeal, finding the consent order did not impose a unilateral obligation on the husband for tertiary education costs.

What was decided in [2025] SGHCF 36?

[2025] SGHCF 36 (VBL v VBM) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 5 June 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically maintenance, consent orders, and matrimonial assets. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.

Who were the parties in VBL v VBM ([2025] SGHCF 36)?

The appellant in [2025] SGHCF 36 was VBL, and the respondent was VBM. Legal representation included Sterling Law Corporation and Raymond Yeo. The case was decided on 5 June 2025 in the High Court (Family Division).