WGM v WGN

[2025] SGHCF 23 High Court (Family Division) 11 April 2025 • HCF/DT 2222/2014 ( FC/SUM 3577/2024 ) • 13 min read

6 cases cited

Key facts

Court	High Court (Family Division)
Decided	11 April 2025
Judge	Choo Han Teck
Charges / claim	Family Law
Counsel	Aequitas Law LLP, CNPLaw LLP, Hu Huimin, Lim Tat, See Tow Soo Ling, Shann Liew Zi Xuan, Subir Singh Grewal, Wang Tianyi

Source: [2025] SGHCF 23, High Court (Family Division), decided 11 April 2025 — eLitigation. Updated 25 June 2026.

Catchwords

Family Law - Matrimonial assets - Division

Practice Areas

Family Law

Judges (1)

Choo Han Teck Delivered

Counsel (8)

Aequitas Law LLP Firm CNPLaw LLP Firm Hu Huimin Counsel Defendant Lim Tat Counsel Plaintiff See Tow Soo Ling Counsel Defendant Shann Liew Zi Xuan Counsel Defendant Subir Singh Grewal Counsel Plaintiff Wang Tianyi Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

WGM Plaintiff WGN Defendant

Case Significance

[2025] SGHCF 23 is a High Court (Family Division) decision dated 11 April 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing matrimonial assets. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by WGM (plaintiff) against WGN (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Aequitas Law LLP and CNPLaw LLP. The judgment cites 6 cases.

Summary

An application to determine the operative dates for identifying and valuing the matrimonial asset pool in a divorce where the parties divorced in 2014 but the consent order on asset division was later set aside. The court held that both the determination and valuation dates should be the interim judgment date of 10 July 2014, as the parties had already agreed on values at that time.

What was decided in [2025] SGHCF 23?

[2025] SGHCF 23 (WGM v WGN) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 11 April 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically matrimonial assets. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.

Who were the parties in WGM v WGN ([2025] SGHCF 23)?

The plaintiff in [2025] SGHCF 23 was WGM, and the defendant was WGN. Legal representation included Aequitas Law LLP and CNPLaw LLP. The case was decided on 11 April 2025 in the High Court (Family Division).