SUN YONGJIAN & Anor v GOH SENG HENG
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 47 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 21 March 2025 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing judgments and orders. The judgment was delivered by Pang Khang Chau. The case was brought by Fu Shanping and others (plaintiff) against Goh Seng Heng (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP. The judgment cites 10 cases (8 Singapore, 2 foreign) and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Bankruptcy Act. This decision has been cited by 2 subsequent judgments in the dataset.
[2025] SGHC 47 explained
SUN YONGJIAN & Anor v GOH SENG HENG ([2025] SGHC 47) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 21 March 2025. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 2 other reported Singapore judgments, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 47 about?
SUN YONGJIAN & Anor v GOH SENG HENG ([2025] SGHC 47) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Judgments and orders — Setting aside of default judgment”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 47 consider?
The judgment refers to Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
How influential is [2025] SGHC 47?
Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC 47 has been cited by 2 later reported Singapore judgments. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
Two Chinese nationals sought enforcement of a $16.5 million default judgment obtained against Dr Goh Seng Heng for alleged fraudulent misrepresentation in connection with investments in shares of Aesthetic Medical Partners. The court dismissed Dr Goh's appeal to set aside the default judgment, finding that despite a potentially meritorious defence, the inordinate and inexcusable delay of over 13 months in applying to set aside the judgment caused irremediable prejudice to the claimants.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 47?
[2025] SGHC 47 (SUN YONGJIAN & Anor v GOH SENG HENG) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 21 March 2025 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically judgments and orders. The judgment was delivered by Pang Khang Chau.
Who were the parties in SUN YONGJIAN & Anor v GOH SENG HENG?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 47 was Fu Shanping, Sun Yongjian, and the defendant was Goh Seng Heng. Legal representation included Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP. The case was decided on 21 March 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 47?
[2025] SGHC 47 was delivered by Pang Khang Chau in the High Court (General Division) on 21 March 2025. The case concerned Civil Procedure.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 47 cite?
[2025] SGHC 47 cites 10 prior decisions, including 2 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Bankruptcy Act. The decision has itself been cited by 2 subsequent judgments.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (10)
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 47)